What are the compilation styles of historical works?

What is the compilation system of historical works? In short, it refers to a certain writing format, formal structure and writing method followed by historians or history book compilers when compiling historical works. According to different perspectives, the analysis of the compilation style of history books can be divided into two types: content style and method style. From the content point of view, the compilation of history books began with the creation of eight books such as "Rite", "Music", "Fa", "Calendar", "Divination" and "Leveling", and later historians compiled history books. Regarding the changes in the compilation structure of historical books in past dynasties, Zhao Yi's Notes on the Twenty-two History of Qing Dynasty pointed out: "Eight books were created by historical migration, and the title of the country was poked by discipline. Because of this, the Han Dynasty formulated ten records, in which the calendar of laws shall prevail, the book of rites and Le Shu shall prevail, the book of food shall prevail, the book of sacrifice in the suburbs shall prevail, the book of Guan Zen shall prevail, the book of astronomy shall prevail, and the book of gully edge shall prevail. In addition, criminal law, five elements, geography, art and literature have been added. After that, calendar, music, astronomy, geography, criminal law, and history of past dynasties are indispensable. The Book of the Later Han Dynasty changed its geography to a county country, adding four records of etiquette, sacrifice, officials and costumes. The three countries have no ambition. The books of Jin, Song and Qi Dynasties are probably the same as the previous books, except that Fu Ruizhi was added to the Song Dynasty book, and Qi Shu also has auspicious meaning. Neither Liang nor Nan Shi has ambition. Shu Wei changed astronomy into astronomical phenomena, geography into topography, auspiciousness into a charm, and everything else was the same. At the same time, he increased his official name and released his ambition to have a second child. The history of Qi, Zhou and North China has no ambition. There is no ambition in the books of the Sui Dynasty. Today's annals were written by Liang, Chen, Qi, Zhou and Sui, and their art was classics. Three records of the New Tang Book were added to the book, namely, national defense, election and military system. The historical books of Xue in the Five Dynasties decreased. There is also a study on the division of vocation in the History of the Five Dynasties in Europe, that is, the renaming of astronomical geography. The records of the history of the Song Dynasty are similar to those of the previous history. However, Liao in history increased the ambitions of battalion guards, Bona, tribes and soldiers. Its national customs are also natural. The history of Jin and Yuan Dynasties is the same as that of Song Dynasty, but it lacks artistry and literariness. The records of Ming history are the same as those of Song history, and its artistic and literary records are specific manned writings, while the previous generations that have been circulated in the world have none. " As for the detailed compilation of history books, Yun once said: "Historians are in trouble, but have no ambition. History is either ambitious but not ambitious; Or nothing. " "The Book of Southern Qi" makes it very clear that astronomical matters are secret, so I don't know my household registration, so I don't do it. Does the fruit meet the question? Suppression research is sparse? It is not surprising that the original name of Sui Zhi, The Story of the Five Dynasties, was incorporated into Sui Shu by a letter without attachments, including the previous generation. Shen Yue's Song Shu Zhi Zhu also carries a lot of things from the previous generation. Why should the law go downstream to find the source? Hasn't the case of restraining historians from breaking the limit been closed yet? Sima Qian is an official book, and historians are famous for astronomical phenomena. However, the sun, the moon and the stars are not easy to die, and not every generation has its own day. Therefore, Liu Zhiji's "Stone" said: It is not necessary to record the sky. What is the result? Does the author have any questions? Geography of Han Dynasty contains mountains and rivers, while Geography of Liao Dynasty likes to talk about evolution, Geography of Tang Dynasty and Geography of Jin Dynasty also record local tributes in detail, while History of the Five Dynasties and Examination of Vocational Schools omit everything except place names. Which is the result, the detailed core and the sign, or the simple and strict style? The History of Han Dynasty initiated the artistic and literary records, while Sui Shu recorded them in the classics, Tang Shu Xin Jiu and Song Shi also had artistic and literary records, but his history was missing. Its author should prepare a generation of documents; If it is not the author, it is considered that the title of the article has nothing to do with the praise and criticism of good and evil. What is this? Aren't the ambitions of Song Shu and Fu Rui, Shu Wei and Shi Lao, and the ancients, Tang Shu and the Prime Minister too extravagant? What should be detailed? All the historical records "Records of Literature and Art" contain books at the same time, while the King James version "Shi Ming" only contains the works of one generation. History is just a watch, but the King James' History of the Ming Dynasty shows pictures outside the watch, which harms others and does not benefit others. So, the nature of profit and loss can be revealed by looking up? Twenty-three years of history, sweating like a pig, scholars or leaders are not bad, and the same is true. "In terms of methods, the compilation styles of history books mainly include chronological style, biographical style, national style, chronological style, chronicle, chronological style and so on.