(1) Zhang Zhan's Notes in Jin Dynasty, (2) Lu's Notes in Tang Dynasty, (3) Liezi's texts, collation, exegesis and textual research of Zhang Zhan's Notes and Lu's Notes, (4) Shuo Wen Jie Zi edited by Yin Jingshun in Tang Dynasty and supplemented by Chen Jingyuan in Song Dynasty, and textual research of related explanations. Except for Zhang Zhulu's explanation, all theories are crowned with circles.
Secondly, Liezi has many versions, and most of the publications after Yuan and Ming Dynasties are annotated with exegesis, which makes Zhang's annotations and exegesis different. Wang Jipei, a scholar of the Qing Dynasty, started with the rectification movement, took mistakes from Song Shu, Compilation and Mutual Annotation, Ming Tang Shu and Yu Jiu Zhang Wang Zhenheng Shu, and engraved them into the Hu series, and the rest were original editions. However, there is still room for negotiation, that is, to retrieve the Northern Song edition hidden in Qu Tong Jian Guan, that is, Jifu Edition, Tiehuaguan Shadow Song Edition, Daozang Edition, Bai Wen Edition, Xie Yi Edition, Linkou Shuyi Edition, Xie Edition and Yuanji Sixie Edition. Benyuan and Mingshide Tang Ben studied in this school, and chose kindness and following. If all the books have mistakes, although the textual research is clear, I still dare not correct them. The similarities and differences of other characters, except for obvious mistakes and omissions in the reference books, are also highlighted for reference. There are several examples and collections in the descriptions of ancient books in Dunhuang, Wang Zhongmin.
Thirdly, there are more than 23,000 notes written by Zhang Zhan, such as Notes in Beitang, Notes of Shu Qun, Genji of Wen Yi, Notes for Beginners, Magnolia Taiping, Liu Tie in White Space, Splendid Wanhua Valley, Genji of Shi Wen and other ancient books. Gegu's book citation rate often changes, which is not necessarily completely reliable. This book only records those that are helpful to collation and exegesis.
Fourth, Liezi was forged by Jin people, almost. Wang Jipei said? Rely on philosophers, and benefit philosophers slightly. Can its patchwork collection of traces be repeated by those who read it in books? . Although this book does not dredge the proof, all the places that can be copied will be marked by collation and interpretation, and it also reveals the original ears of fraud.
5. Who are the scholars since the Qing Dynasty? Pre-Qin ancient books? There are many collations and explanations about Liezi, but there are not many monographs about Liezi except Lu, Ren, Yu Yue, Tao Hongqing and others. Liezi's articles are often followed, so choose widely. Therefore, those who can help readers to research and explain ancient books will be added to the list. For the empty talk on the stone side, Gaijia gave up.
6. Zhang Zhan has a close relationship with Liezi, but his actions are not detailed. I have also arranged a little for Appendix 1. ..
Seven, pseudo Liu Xiangzhi's Catalogue, Zhang Zhan's Preface, Lu's Preface, Chen Jingyuan's Preface, Ren's Preface, Qin Enfu's Preface and Wang Jipei's Preface are all related to the records in this book, which will help readers understand this book. Therefore, the full text is contained in Appendix II.
Eight, regarding Liezi's word discrimination, Huang's General Examination of Ancient and Modern Pseudo-Books and Zhang Xincheng's General Examination of Pseudo-Books have been edited, but they are both lacking. The rest of the story is reassembled, with my own opinion, which is Appendix III.
9. All quotations have been reviewed. Only a few schools said that it is not yet possible to compare them one by one. Please correct me if there are any differences.
Ten, the use of quotation marks, or indicate the beginning and end of the quotation, or pay attention to important words, these will help the meaning of the text clear. However, if you use it too often, you will lose it. Therefore, it is appropriate to use it or not. So if you quote a family, the quotation marks under the name "XXX" will be omitted, and the first one will be easily marked, so don't bother. There are quotations in the middle, which should be identified; This can avoid repeated use of quotation marks and avoid confusion. For example, respecting and interpreting the text has its own style and is easy to understand. If not needed, the quotation marks are also omitted. And so on. This is a self-created rule, but fortunately, it is not a constant law.