Regarding this dialogue between Mencius and He, Mr. Huang believes that "if a person is guilty, he will be punished" is a universally effective ethical rule, and it is immoral and unfair for Shun to treat his younger brother differently from the four criminals. We hold opposite views on this. Shun's behavior is to deal with specific things from the natural law, which not only does not violate the natural law, but also does not violate justice. It is the concrete application of natural laws and justice in concrete things.
* * * The crimes of industry, industry, agriculture, agriculture are crimes that endanger the world, and their crimes are unforgivable. If they are forgiven, they will spread to people all over the world. Although the elephant is ruthless, its crime only harms Shun, not the world. Therefore, although elephants are not kind to workers, dogs, three seedlings and years in behavior, the degree of harm is quite different. Even from the principle of "a legally prescribed punishment for a crime" in today's law, obedient behavior cannot be said to violate the principle of justice. The bad situation is only a family problem. If you can make it repent and turn over a new leaf, why not forgive it? It is unforgivable to be unkind, unforgivable to be unforgivable, but it will harm people all over the world.