(1) Similarity:
1 was collected and sorted by Qing officials at the order of the emperor.
2. They cover most aspects of China's ancient culture.
They are all official books of King James.
(2) I listed these differences in the form of a table:
Integration of Ancient and Modern Books and Sikuquanshu
Dynasty: Kangxi VS Qianlong
Duration: 28 years versus 9 years
Type: Giant Books VS the largest series in ancient China.
Source: data and literature.
(This point needs to be explained. The so-called information refers to both written and unwritten, while literature mainly refers to written)
Classification: 6 parts, 32 coding pairs, 4 parts, 44 classes and 66 genera.
Focus: the average proportion of factions VS Confucianism is dominant.
Number of editors: small or large?
The reasons for compiling two books in Qing dynasty;
1, The Integration of Ancient and Modern Books takes the average proportion of ideas in the total books (only roughly average). During the Qianlong period, the ruling class needed to further control the thoughts of literati, increase the proportion of Confucian culture and consolidate the dominant position of Confucianism.
The above is the explanation given to me by my high school history teacher. Personally, it is related to Kangxi Qianlong's character.
Kangxi is a man with a very high cultural accomplishment, and he has studied all aspects of knowledge to a considerable extent, so all the classics compiled under his rule have this "general" intuitive impression.
Gan Long, on the other hand, found out the most literary inquisitions in Qing Dynasty, and he naturally rejected the so-called "different" culture. In addition, this guy has a serious big head disease (just look at his "perfect" title), likes to show off and wants to make great achievements, so he has inserted a pole in the cultural field.