Characteristics of China's concept of human nature

In the collation of ancient books, basic books and proofreading books should be selected and followed. In the contemporary era when information dissemination is developed, we should strive to learn the achievements of academic research and scientific and technological progress in time and learn from others. Guanzhi did not copy the lost books in the series of Double Plum Classics, but directly used the original appearance of Volume 28 of Fang, which is completely correct. However, when selecting Yin and Yang Fu of Heaven and Earth, Guan Zhi knew that this fu was "copied and copied, with many omissions" (page 59), but he still followed Ye Ben. Of course, Ye Ben played an important role in finishing. "Volume in the Room" points out frankly: "This book was recorded in Dunhuang manuscripts (No.2539) collected by French pelliot ... and it was recorded in the" Double Eyebrow Mirror Series "of old Ye Dehui, and there were many errors in the biography. Here is the record rewritten according to the original. " (page 93)

"Guanzhi" contains "the romance of repairing the truth" and has no postscript. Let's refer to Kuen Yeung's translation of Gao Luopei's KaoMi Opera with the same name, and there is a postscript (392 pages) written by the Ming people, from which we can get the information circulating in the version. "Volume in the Room" is also an old edition collected according to the "Hundred Editions" of Taiwan Province Province. Gao Luopei's "Top Ten Secretaries" also has this kind. "(page 208) at the end of the article" Eleven, winning tricks ",there are" the next nine articles in the manuscript of Taiwan Province Province. When interacting and integrating, the scenery at the beginning will be wonderful. " (Page 2 14) There is no such sentence in Yao Ji's Guanju, and it is verified in the Secret Play. There are also some missing articles in Ji Ji Zhen Jing (page 170 ~ 172) in Guanzhi. "Volume in the Room" has the same name, according to the old records printed by "Baibian" in Taiwan Province Province. Gao Luopei's "Ten Secretaries" also has this kind, lacking the first paragraph. "(page 204) The first paragraph of Ji Ji Zhen Jing collected by Guanzhi is also missing, and there are some mistakes in typesetting. According to the typography of Textual Research on the Secret Play and Volume in the Room, "Jiji's name is easy to change ... once you correct the truth, you will cherish it." They are all arranged in small font. The third line of Guanzhi, 170, "suck its food again, ... the short soldiers rejoin." "Guanzhi" mistakenly arranged the words of this line in the small notes. Judging from comparing other books and trying to figure out the upper and lower versions, these two versions of Guanzhi are obviously mishandled.

Guanzhi occasionally makes mistakes. For example, the "shallow internal stem" on page 135, line 1 1, can be supplemented with "shallow internal (jade) stem" according to the context and context. On page 154, the eyebrow title was wrongly classified as "medical prescription clustering" and should be corrected to "medical heart prescription". On page 6 13, the second line of the sentence is wrong. "If you inhale its gas and swallow its liquid, it will …" This sentence should be corrected to "If you inhale its gas and swallow its liquid, it will …". In addition, when Guan Ju compiled Wang Shiying's "Guang Si Wu Yao" in the Qing Dynasty, he compiled the first kind of seed method, but deleted the four sides of the seed pill attached to this method. As a matter of fact, this doctor in Qing Dynasty published this book as a gift with the word "Xicheng" at his own expense, and the seed pill in Neizhong acupoint is not only a "bait for daily labor" (originally engraved with five postscript of Guangsi), but also a secret recipe of the court imported from abroad in Ming Dynasty. Of course, flaws don't hide Yu. We try our best to organize, edit, typeset and print by going up one flight of stairs, improve the quality of fine classic books and make Guanzhi more perfect. This may be the author's view that only trees can not see the forest. As readers, we expect the original intention of a good book to be unquestionable and unswerving.