The Chronicle of Modern Bamboo Books, which is regarded as a fake, is only a fake, not completely false. How are forgeries made? You didn't make this up.
For example.
There are many lost books in ancient times, but some fragments of these lost books will be quoted by other books handed down from generation to generation. However, in the process of restoring according to the contents quoted in handed down books, there are often copying errors, intentional or unintentional expansion and brain supplement, which lead to the final fake book. What you say is false, this outline is true, what you say is true, and some untenable contents have been repeatedly verified.
However, regarding the contradiction between Yao Shunyu's power inheritance and Yi Yin's usurpation in historical materials such as Bamboo Slips, it is hard to say which is true. After all, bamboo books are the official history books of Jin and Wei during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, which is well known. Orthodox history books, except bamboo books, are all handed down by Confucianism, and the state of Jin is the hegemonic heresy that Confucianism hates most. Different ideologies have different interpretations of history. Therefore, in the Confucian historical materials, Yao Shunyu is doomed; In the bamboo calendar, it is a dark battle of power, and extinction is just an empty condom. I really want to say that the record is more true, and there is no place to say it, because the Yao, Shun and Yu era is thousands of years away from the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and historical materials are extremely scarce. Neither the Confucian classic theory of abdication nor the conspiracy theory of bamboo annals can simply explain the truth or falsehood.
But one thing is proved by archaeological data, that is, the * * * and administration of the Western Zhou Dynasty are indeed the * * * Bo and the generation of the Emperor recorded in the bamboo annals, rather than the Duke of Zhou and the * * * in power recorded in the Confucian classics. From this point of view, Confucianism may have made intentional mistakes in beautifying the ancients for ideological needs. The content of bamboo annals may be closer to the truth.