Evaluation and Controversy of Ancient Books in Huan Tan

Historians all over the world generally believe that "Huan Tan" is a fake book, probably written by Li in the early 1970s. It was written in 1979 and has no historical value. The basis is mainly as follows:

1, improper use of words. Words such as equality between men and women, husband's rights, nationalities and cultures in the world began to appear in modern times, while words such as Korea, Mongolia, Heishui and Shandong appeared later.

2. 1979 There is no evidence of the existence of "Talking about Ji Gu". (that is, the author and the year of writing are false)

3. Inconsistent with other historical books, some modern books were quoted.

4. There are no ancient Korean relics in Sumer and other places, which are the territory of Huan State in the book, and the period when Huan State and Beida State existed was the Neolithic Age, so it is impossible to have a state.

5. The lineage of Bohai reflects the misunderstanding before the middle of 20th century, such as the misunderstanding that King Jing and King Ai of Silla have been identified as King Ai of Silla.

Some South Korean unofficial history scholars (also known as pseudo-historians) believe that The Story of Huan Tan Valley is credible and try to restore the ancient history of South Korea on this basis, but it has not been recognized by Korean orthodox historians. Among Korean folk, the story of ancient Tantan has great attraction and many followers. Sadly, there are many politicians, scholars and celebrities among these believers. Therefore, the pseudo-historical viewpoints such as Huan Tan Ji Gu hold the right of historical discourse in Korean society, while the views of orthodox historians cannot be recognized by different people.