(selected from/bbsjh/2669/6/10876.html)
One. The credibility of "The Story of the Cloud" does not lie in the so-called official revision and private revision. It has been said before that Chen Zhi started with private revision, and it is confusing to stir up trouble on this issue.
Two. The unreliability of Yun Zhuan is not mainly because the author and publication year cannot be found. If there is such a factor, it is also secondary.
Three. The most important and crucial reason why A Biography of the Cloud is unreliable is that it is a personal biography, and its nature and starting point determine that it can never be equated with other articles cited by Zhu Pei, whose purpose is to record history. Moreover, because of the nature of personal biography, one is that there is no comparability, and the other is that we are writing a biography for someone now, which is mostly praise.
The starting point of personal biography is not to record and explain the whole history, which is the more fundamental reason why it is not credible. In addition, the credibility of other biographies can be used to compare and infer Cloud Biography, so Ma Zhong of Brazil put it very well: "Unlike other ancient books, without credibility, they lose the value of existence. Throughout Pei Songzhi's notes on other stories, other stories, cloud stories, other stories, and guest stories, there are all great things, and every word has its shortcomings and mistakes. "
Of course, in addition to these, we should still have a respectful attitude towards thousands of years of literature. Therefore, when talking about history, it is more reasonable to adopt an attitude of not adopting but not refuting the Cloud Biography.
(This is from /f? kz=95884686
This is a detailed introduction about Cloud Biezhuan.
I went to see it ~ it should be helpful to you ~ I wonder if I can help! ! !