(1) monograph;
(2) Translation, teaching materials, ancient books, reference books and popular science books;
(three) papers, research reports, decision-making consulting research reports. Article 3 The Fujian Social Science Outstanding Achievement Award shall be awarded in the name of the Fujian Provincial People's Government. Awards are held every three years.
Fujian Provincial People's Government entrusts Fujian Provincial Federation of Social Sciences to be responsible for the management, organization and implementation of award-winning activities. Article 4 If the social science works specified in Article 2 of these Measures are officially published or published in the year of award, and meet the following standards, their authors may apply for the "Fujian Social Science Outstanding Achievement Award" in the name of individuals or collectives:
(a) in line with the party's basic line, adhere to the four cardinal principles, adhere to the policy of reform and opening up;
(2) Having scientific innovation and a high academic level in the academic field;
(3) It embodies the spirit of serving socialist modernization. Article 5 An applicant shall submit the following documents to the Provincial Federation of Social Sciences within the prescribed time limit:
(a) "Fujian social science outstanding achievement award declaration form";
(2) The original work and its photocopy;
(three) the recommendation of the relevant units or organizations. Article 6 Any achievement that is equivalent to or higher than this award shall not be declared for participation. Seventh Fujian Social Science Outstanding Achievement Award, by the current Fujian Social Science Outstanding Achievement Award Evaluation Committee (hereinafter referred to as the provincial jury) review.
The provincial jury shall be set up by the Provincial Federation of Social Sciences in conjunction with relevant departments and submitted to the provincial people's government for approval. The members of the provincial jury are experts, scholars and leaders of relevant competent departments engaged in social science work, of which not less than two-thirds have senior titles. Eighth social science works outstanding achievement award specific criteria are:
(1) Monographs: having original opinions on studying major issues of reality and history;
(2) Translation: the translation is accurate and fluent, and the content of the translation has important reference value for studying and solving theoretical or practical problems;
(3) Teaching materials: innovative in content and breakthrough in structure, which are of great application value to scientific research and teaching;
(4) Collation of ancient books: in line with the original intention, the annotations are accurate, and those that are of certain significance or important value to historical textual research are found;
(five) popular science books: to meet the needs of the times, with strong scientific and knowledgeable, and have an important role and benefit in spreading and popularizing social science knowledge;
(six) reference books: scientific style, reliable information, strong knowledge, can reflect the latest scientific research results at home and abroad, with practical or academic value;
(7) Thesis: innovative in the academic field, or able to correctly clarify major theoretical issues or help solve practical problems;
(8) Investigation report and consultation report: Research closely related to the reform and opening up and economic and social development has high application value and obvious social benefits, or has high decision-making reference value. Ninth Fujian social outstanding achievement award evaluation work should follow the following principles:
Adhere to the principles of science, democracy, objectivity and justice;
(two) adhere to the principle of standards and quality;
(3) The principle of giving priority to the works of young authors under the same conditions. Tenth provincial jury review work in accordance with the following procedures:
(1) initial evaluation: organize a discipline evaluation team to be responsible for the initial evaluation and primary selection of the results according to the evaluation criteria;
(2) Re-evaluation: set up a number of re-evaluation teams to re-evaluate the preliminary evaluation results, and recommend all kinds of award-winning candidates to the provincial jury according to the evaluation criteria and the proportion (or quantity) of the selected results;
(3) Final evaluation: The provincial jury will make a final evaluation of the candidate results recommended by each re-evaluation group. The evaluation results of the eleventh provincial jury shall be published within a certain range, and the objection period shall be within 30 days from the date of publication. Twelfth after the announcement of the evaluation results without objection, approved by the provincial people's government, award certificates and bonuses to the winners.
The amount of various bonuses and awards for outstanding achievements in social sciences in Fujian Province shall be proposed by the Provincial Social Science Association in conjunction with the Provincial Department of Finance, and implemented after being submitted to the provincial people's government for approval. Thirteenth winners of outstanding achievements in social sciences and outstanding achievements in natural sciences enjoy the same treatment, and their award-winning achievements are recorded in personnel and academic files as the basis for assessment, promotion, evaluation of professional and technical positions and enjoyment of relevant allowances. Fourteenth to participate in the selection of works of fraud or plagiarism, by the provincial Federation of social sciences to cancel its qualification; Has won the award, the provincial people's government approved the revocation of its award, and to recover the bonus and award certificate; The relevant competent departments shall, depending on the seriousness of the case, be given administrative sanctions according to law; If it constitutes infringement, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law. Article 15 If an evaluation committee member engages in malpractices for personal gain by taking advantage of his position, the provincial social science association will cancel the evaluation qualification, and the relevant competent department will give criticism and education or administrative sanctions depending on the seriousness of the case.