How to write a literary research report
What is the model of the southern vertebra? Γ? Swallow happily? What happened to the car? Is the canyon blowing straw and flushing yellow? Nai is annoyed? Blow your face? Liao? What happened to Nanzhui? Knock on the bottle and suffocate it. Xinnan's seed core is thirsty, but is it awake? Xinxin kangmu? Incredibly γ? Change Xin Xin Nan Angel Kang? Stealing and throwing things in your spare time to change your mind? To do literature research, you should make a literature research report, because this is a report on the achievements of literature research, and you should systematically report what your research has found or what conclusions you have drawn. Therefore, the document research report should first report how you conducted the research and design, or what is the center of your problem and the clue to carry out the document research work. In other words, if your research clues are unclear, you don't know whether your literature is appropriate, whether the collected literature is comprehensive and representative. This means that you must have clear question logic and know what you need. Many times, your research problem is the theme of your literature search. Often in the initial stage of your literature search, your questions are large or inaccurate, which is a gradual and refined process. Practically speaking, the process of searching documents is a process of crossing the dense fog and finding the closest answer you expect. Therefore, document search is not a job of listing all documents, but a process of finding the closest answer along its own question logic. Because each of us has a psychological expectation when studying, hoping to prove something. But when your question is real, there is often no ready-made answer. If the answer you expect has been discussed by others, it means that your problem can't be called a problem at all. Generally speaking, when you search for the most specific concept, and this concept can not be simplified, it means that you are close to the center of the problem. This should be the core keyword of literature search. Then find the most direct related literature through the collection of literature context, especially find the views of recent related literature on this issue. Generally speaking, recent literature means the answer closest to your expectation, because scientific research is an accumulated cause, and recent research should be carried out on the basis of others, which is a further deepening and promotion of others' research. This is why we often need to pay attention to journal articles, because they can generally represent the research situation. If you don't refer to the latest literature, you can say that your research is basically unqualified. After finding the latest literature, analyze their views on this question, whether it is reasonable or not, and how close it is to your answer. If someone's answer completely exceeds your expectations, then you are in a learning stage and have not reached the level of discussion and discussion. If what you expect is not involved, analyze why, is your question worthless or has been discussed. Then you can trace back the relevant literature according to his reference index to see what is the theoretical basis of his research, what kind of problems have been solved, to what extent, and how valuable your own problems are. This is also the process of judging your problem. Usually, the research progress is not linear, and different researchers generally study a problem from different angles. No matter how they study, it is impossible for all kinds of scattered schemes to synthesize a whole scheme, because there are always conflicts between various schemes, and they all take care of one aspect and ignore other aspects, and the angle provided is not comprehensive. This is the reason why your concern has not been covered, and of course, the reason why you can further engage in this research. Your job is to learn from their research, avoid some mistakes and deficiencies, make up for their defects and deficiencies in a certain sense, and of course, more importantly, put forward your own solutions to improve the solution of a problem. This is the fundamental purpose of your literary research. So your literature research report is to report how you achieved this goal step by step. In the literature research report, you should first understand the process of the problem, that is, how to deepen the understanding of the problem step by step. At this time, you don't need to report whether you have deepened your understanding of the problem or consulted the literature first, because the two processes can't be completely separated. Everyone knows that you must have consulted the literature to reach the level of your final report. When you report the process of understanding the problem, you are actually reporting the process of determining your reference range, which is the irreducible keyword mentioned above. Secondly, you should report what kind of authoritative retrieval tools you use to retrieve documents, how many effective documents you have retrieved and how these documents are distributed. For example, the classification of articles and periodicals, the distribution of article time, the distribution of article authors and the distribution of article types. Thirdly, you should report the changes in the concept or concept of research on this issue in the literature you have consulted, which leads to the changes in research methods, research design, research results and research conclusions. In view of these changes, you must find signs and masterpieces of change. Otherwise, your work is not finished. This work is quite hard, and it is impossible to get satisfactory results without in-depth study. Secondly, you should report what problems exist in different changes, and to what extent these problems have been solved in the later research process, how many problems have been solved until the recent research, what are the revelations of these solutions, what kind of problems are the most urgent so far, what must be paid attention to in order to solve this problem, how to learn from the experience and lessons of previous research, and so on. Finally, you should report your research results systematically. This report is comprehensive, narrative, and discussed. It is generally logical in chronological order and runs through them from the past to the present. This process must be described after you can fully grasp it, as if you were a witness to the whole research progress. In this way, a systematic, well-founded and complete text is formed. When drafting the research report, it must be remembered that the evaluation must be objective and cannot be simplified. Many people take a simplistic approach, only sit up and take notice of other people's work, and finally completely deny it. This evaluation method is actually denying the value of one's own research, which makes people look like a very ignorant and arrogant attitude. Note: Everything and people in the research report should be read. You can't just see things without seeing people.