Why didn't Lu's Spring and Autumn Annals burn by Qin Shihuang?

Lv Buwei, after Qin Shihuang's brother took charge of the country,

Because ownership has great power, diners, contacts and so on.

? It became a force that influenced Qin Shihuang;

Another book, Spring and Autumn Annals by Lu, has won many praises.

Let Qin Shihuang take the means of banishing drinking lords,

Give Lv Buwei the death penalty and eradicate his political power.

But why is Lu's book Spring and Autumn Annals,

But it was not implicated and banned. What about destruction?

The purpose of Qin Shihuang's burning books is not to destroy books, but to break the criticism of all students (note that it is not just Confucian scholars). Just because he burned folk books doesn't mean that the National Library of Xianyang has no burned books.

When Chu and Han contended, Xiang Yu set fire to Xianyang City, because the books lost by this fire were probably several times more than those burned by Qin Shihuang!

Was Lu Chunqiu burned by Qin Shihuang?

Actually, I don't know.

But why didn't you lose it? Can we think about it?

1. Does the content of Lv Chunqiu involve "criticizing the first emperor"? If not, why did Qin Shihuang burn it when he had nothing to do? The content of "Lu's Spring and Autumn Annals" is quite complicated, but I don't think it's propaganda (Lu is king). If you think so, you may want to look for evidence that he should be politically involved.

2. Even if it was burned by Qin Shihuang, it is possible to stay in the library of Xianyang City and then escape the disaster of Xiang Yu burning books; But it is more likely to spread among people ... the ancient books lost or handed down in the pre-Qin period are not all related to the burning of books by Qin Shihuang, and may be magnified by later historians!

Your suspicion is good, but you may find more evidence to prove it, so turn to Lv Chunqiu to read it!