Paragraph 2: Repeat the facts. Tell the readers of your article why you want to talk about this problem. That's the beginning of the comment.
The third paragraph: talk about things. Around your first introduction, combine facts to show your point of view.
The fourth paragraph: you can talk about it. For example, think of another thing, but remember that under the same theme! Don't talk about the quality of foreigners, say Snowden! Let's talk about foreign high technology! To the point.
Paragraph 5: Take it back and briefly reiterate the main body and significance of your article.
Question 2: How to write current affairs comments? The role of comments is the flag and soul of the media. Since comments are so important, writing good comments has become an important topic. So how can I write a good review? Comment writing can have different paths according to the specific circumstances of the article. But in all kinds of differences, we can still capture and sort out the stable rules and general cognitive framework. Based on my personal experience, I do some superficial business discussions from nine aspects, such as content, quality, strength, language, mentality, style, context, thinking and appeal, in order to seek advice from Fang Jia. When writing a summary, we should pay attention to the following aspects: First, the fundamental difference between the summary and other articles is that it is a well-founded article, so the article should present a well-founded part. In other words, an article must have the content of reasoning, something beyond narration, thinking and discussion. "Talking without doing" is the taboo of comments, and it is also a low-level phenomenon that still appears in some comments today. Second, the quality of comments mainly lies in conception. The quality of comments is determined by "fate". The most important value of critical works lies in their lofty ideas, their ability to pay attention to major social phenomena, or the major propositions behind seemingly minor events, and then to voice major phenomena or propositions, with superb views and extraordinary realm. As a comment, if the point of view itself loses its charm, then the art of speech is insignificant. Third, the power of criticism lies in the beauty of reason. The real power of criticism lies in fact and logic. Only an organic whole composed of facts and logic can truly convince people who can be persuaded. Facts are objective, but logic requires writers to really mobilize their subjective creativity. Strong logic is a powerful force, giving people a rational beauty. Fourth, the beauty of language lies in its discretion and accuracy. Of course, the projection of other factors on language is the unique charm of language. In the general sense I have discussed, the biggest difference between annotation language and other languages is prudence and accuracy. Of course, with appropriate restrictions, whoever has a good language will provide an appropriate expression carrier for comments. Good ideas or opinions will eventually be well expressed. Fifth, we must have an argumentative attitude and have "imaginary enemies" in our hearts. Of course, critical writing will show complex psychological activities, but it is different from narrative and lyric writing. Critical writing is to meet the enemy and respond to different backchat and queries, so it is necessary to have the concepts of "imaginary enemy" and "enemy situation", that is to say, critical writing is a fighting body, so it is necessary to have a fighting posture. Sixth, we should have a good style of work. Of course, there are different styles, and there seems to be no good style, but there is a problem of style adaptation. For example, color can't be said to be better, but on special occasions, the adaptability of a color is easily recognized by everyone, such as black symbolizes sadness, purple symbolizes nobility, white symbolizes purity and so on. Specifically, the style of review articles should also be based on the different characteristics of publication time, occasion, media and audience, thus forming a stable view of what is a good review style. For example, Marx once said that the style of the proletariat should be fought, vivid and never hesitant. Judging from the development of modern criticism in China, Liang Qichao, Zhang Taiyan and Zou Taofen are all very famous critics, but they are different. For example, Liang Qichao's article "Wang Yang is wanton, writing is natural", Zhang Taiyan's article is profound in Chinese studies, but easy to use uncommon allusions, and Zou Taofen's writing is concise and fluent, and he speaks freely. All three are written by everyone, so the review articles should have a style and a style that adapts to specific situations. Of course, everyone immediately felt that Lu Xun's essay style was simply the mouthpiece of the times and was tailor-made for the times. Seventh, the creation of context, which is different from other articles that pursue artistic aesthetics, is clear. The clarity and vagueness of context can be used as the dividing line between critical articles and non-critical articles. Comments are characterized by clarity, because every accurate judgment is suitable for a very specific object, and the conditions of the object cannot be blurred at will. Accurate judgment is based on clear concepts and clear logical thinking. Without a series of clearly formed special contexts, the final judgment can only be nonsense. Any ambiguity that should not appear will hurt the persuasiveness of the article and the quality of comments. Eight is the characteristics of thinking. Critical thinking is a kind of thinking towards aggregation, of course, from divergence to aggregation. The people we discuss are always very different. We should see their similarities from all kinds of differences, aggregate our thinking and analyze the similarities, and our comments will emerge as the times require. From divergence to convergence, let our comments have theory ... >>
Question 3: How to write current affairs comments? The following is just my personal way of writing current affairs reviews.
1 List current affairs and collect current affairs materials (there may be questions from Teacher Shi, but you can find rich materials yourself).
Express opinions on one or several viewpoints in the current events, such as what Fan Paopao did was an arrogant and stupid practice that was extremely harmful to social morality.
Then write down why this view holds. Use analysis, such as the hypothesis method, to compare and demonstrate what would happen if all teachers in China were like Mi Pao, such as the person you want to criticize or praise, for example, light versus darkness, darkness versus light, morality versus morality, and so on. And causal argument, that's right. . . That's right. . . . That's right. . . (Of course, there are more than these three technologies, but they are all relatively simple and easy to use. )
Summarize what your point of view is, why you support my point of view, and so on.
Finally, add an appeal to society.
Question 4: How to write the current political commentary? Briefly describe what happened, then analyze the background reason of what happened, and then explain the meaning of what happened. Don't be too long-winded and complicated in high school current affairs comments. These steps will do. It is required to write in political terms from different angles such as country, collective and individual, economy, politics and culture. Subtitles make the structure clearer.
Question 5: How to write current affairs comments? The basic requirements for writing comments are as follows:
The first is timeliness. The restrictions are aimed at the whole news dissemination. Judging from the spread of news commentary, the timeliness requirements of current commentary should be higher and stricter, not so much demanding. For example, the requirement of Jiaxing Daily for its "Jiaxing Times Review" is to "comment at the first time" on the news front line. {4} Many "Xinhua Times Reviews" of Xinhua News Agency are also broadcast with news events or news reports at any time, and some even broadcast earlier than news reports to seize the commanding heights of public opinion guidance. In short, comments are required in a timely, ready and immediate manner.
The second is pertinence. That's what it means. Where did it come from? What is this for? Targeted or not. Xinhua News Agency's requirements for Xinhua Times Review are "adapting to circumstances", "grasping news events, keeping abreast of the times" and "strong pertinence". The People's Daily's pursuit of "People's Commentary" is to "pay attention to the facts" and "let the commentary and the news go hand in hand", which means that the commentary should see everything, and it should not be aimless, moaning and indiscriminate.
The third is militancy. This is an innate tradition of current commentary, which comes from the function of supervising the running of newspapers, from the characteristics of debates among bourgeois newspapers in modern China, and even from the nicknames of "short commentary" (1896, Su Bao, which was founded in Shanghai on June 26th) and "criticism" (1907), that is. Who are you cursing? Of course, one scolds corruption and the other scolds being rich and heartless. It is the combative requirement of the current commentary that makes it reflect the characteristics of "sharp and spicy"
The fourth is simplicity. Because the commentary is characterized by "conciseness, brevity and pituity", dagger and javelin style, and because the commentary has strict requirements for timeliness and quick hand-to-hand combat, we can't and can't take the "long" route. We can only ask that the deepest thoughts, mature opinions and correct views be expressed in the simplest words. This requirement is relatively high. You should see some real kung fu waiting for you. Here, simply put, it is possible to obtain convenient results. Not short and empty, short and ineffective. The emphasis is on simplicity and convenience, as Zheng Banqiao said, "Simplify Sanqiu Tree by deleting complexity". For example, 1907 65438+ 10/8 On the same day, The Times published a comment on the event that the American envoy asked Qing * * * to recruit Chinese workers to dig canals in Panama, USA:
Panama river workers should not go, they will die of illness. Beauty should not go to Panama River workers, who will either die of illness or be abused.
The reason is known to the people of China and * * *. However, the American envoy is still asking * * *, why? * * * will never refuse.
* * * solid taste smell refused to yi, but traitors can make a contract, return home to recruit, why? Will * * * refuse, never refuse.
"* * * I wonder if Joking * * * is really deaf?" * * * ignored, and * * * was heartless? Without a name, the name says: I don't really love the people.
I don't blame the traitors, only * *. Total * * * one hundred words, but written interlocking, layers of push, ask yourself and answer, colorful, at one go, hit the point. After reading it, I just felt that it was a powerful thing, hitting the nail on the head and hitting the point. Even today, such criticisms and comments seem to be inspiring and enlightening.
In addition to these four basic requirements, we should be well-founded, coherent and self-evident in specific writing. That's right. When we talk about critical writing, we should take reason as the criterion, that is, we should dare and be good at clarifying your point of view and telling your truth. And you have to be reasonable to convince people. This is called "traveling around the world with reason". Well-founded is the argument among the three elements of current commentary, which is the requirement and process of "based on facts" and "facts speak louder than words", and it is the inevitable requirement to make current commentary well-founded, irrefutable and convincing. Word order refers to the order of writing, which is the norm and requirement of the transition. In other words, there must be rules, rules and logic. What to say first, then what to say,
What to say, the order of what to say at last; You may not be too particular, but you must not be confused, incoherent, unclear and unconvincing. Justify yourself, that is to say, you must convince yourself first, you must think clearly and understand the truth first ... >>