How to treat the China collection in the British Museum?

This year, I was fortunate to be influenced by a colleague in China. I have seen some domestic cultural relics exhibitions (I didn't have the habit and interest of visiting museums before), mainly ceramic jade articles and some unearthed cultural relics. Of course, I'm not an expert on cultural relics, but over the past few months, I have seen some China exhibits in Delft, the Netherlands, as well as the V&A and Cardiff National Museums. An amazing discovery is that China's collections in foreign museums are obviously better than similar collections in some domestic museums, such as the luster, color and completeness of ceramics. I just want to thank the West for "plundering" China. Otherwise, you can't see such good old things. Many times, especially in Britain, the largest colonial country, you can enjoy free visits. I think of some reports: increasingly wealthy China capitalists are trying to buy back China cultural relics at international auctions. Of course, China's report is obviously a tribute to these rich patriots, and they will feel a little proud. But I don't think it's a good thing, because we haven't learned how to protect cultural relics and the relevant supporting systems have not been established. All these need time to learn. Think about it, it took hundreds of years for Britain to gradually establish private collections and public institutions. No wonder some time ago Greece announced the opening of the New Acropolis Museum, which was built with huge investment and can accommodate two Parthenon carved belts currently stored in the British Museum (of course, we don't know whether Britain will return them. According to my current thinking, it is better not to pay them back in the era of globalization, not to mention the huge cost of collecting history. Secondly, ceramics (like tea) have gone through hundreds of years (or longer? The history of foreign trade is one of the essences of China culture. The ceramic products of Museum A show this historical fact well. Interestingly, it was really funny when I first saw the figures painted on some ceramic products, but they were westerners' faces. They look funny. I thought that hundreds of years ago, the West was imitating China. I thought that only backward China has been imitating the West, so it has become a "manufacturing power" and a "primitive dwarf". However, the products similar to western imitation China ceramics that I saw in the British Museum yesterday were actually produced in Jingdezhen. It turned out that craftsmen in China, according to their imagination of westerners' preferences and the style of China culture, fired ceramic products and exported them to the west. So, when you see such funny ceramics, don't think that the west is imitating China culture, no! Many of these so-called ceramics imitating China come from China people themselves. Interesting, isn't it? Of course, there may be some traces of imitating China ceramics at first, so it may be important to learn the firing technology. But later, the West established its own ceramic factory and gradually got rid of China's influence. There are no ceramics that people in China find funny. At present, it is difficult to find made in china for ceramic products in London shopping malls, whether it is daily-use porcelain or craft porcelain. They have their own brands, such as Wedgwood. This point is worthy of in-depth study, that is, to understand the specific process of how the West looks up to China ceramics and establishes its own system. Finally, there is an interesting phenomenon. No matter which museum, it is difficult to buy rich souvenirs based on China's collection. It's really weird. Is it related to copyright? China won't allow it? Or did the British side not organize the development of derivatives of related collections because of market problems? As a result, I only bought an English brochure of Sun Tzu's Art of War yesterday, which was not published in China.