It's not difficult to eliminate bromhidrosis with Baihua.
China's philosophy (history) is far inferior to philology in document arrangement. It not only sorts out a narrow range of documents, but more importantly, its sorting method is basically not the traditional method of sorting out documents, but selects documents based on philosophy, forming such as "China's metaphysical history (or data compilation)", "China's dialectics history (or data compilation)" and "China's atheism history (or data compilation)". The legitimacy of this method itself is questionable.
The main purpose and function of China's philosophy (history) is not to sort out documents, but to reinterpret them. China's philosophy explains Taoism by philosophy, and its legitimacy has been questioned. Not only can it not make people close to Taoism, but it makes people more and more alienated from Taoism. This point has been discussed by many people. (This article focuses on stating the facts. As for what results this fact will lead to and how to evaluate it, it is not the main purpose of this article. )
Since China's philosophy can't provide meaning for folk life (including traditional folk life and modern life), nor can it provide meaning for the national political life, and it can't effectively inherit the scholarship, what is its significance? The more important question is: Where is China's philosophy going?
May 11, 24/June 28, 24
Note:
[i] The above demonstration of the construction of meaning does not flaunt a certain theory, but goes straight to life (or returns to the position of life without a theoretical position), and shows how meaning is constructed with the question-answer-line structure of life. More importantly, everyone can use the way of meaning construction of question-answer-line to test their own lives. Therefore, question-answer-line is life. Therefore, I think this way of saying that the construction of meaning is explained from life itself is more powerful than using the theory derived from life.
[ii] The Characteristics of China's Philosophy by Mou Zongsan, p. 21, Shanghai, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1st edition in November 1997.
[iii] It should be noted that "use" here is also a modern use, which is very different from ancient times. The use of ancient times mainly refers to the cultivation of qi and peace, and the settlement of life. Today's use mainly refers to the practicality at the material level.