What does it mean to be sexually incompatible in court?

"Three natures" refers to the authenticity, legitimacy and relevance of evidence, so if "three natures" are not recognized, it is necessary to explain and prove the authenticity, legitimacy and relevance of evidence. Without evidential ability, you are not qualified as the basis for determining the facts of a case, and of course, there is no probative force, that is, there is no probative effect and value on the facts. In other words, the ability of evidence is the premise and condition of probative force.

Three characteristics of evidence: authenticity under objective circumstances, relevance to the case, and legality of acquisition form.

What is the objective truth of the evidence? The objective authenticity of evidence refers to the fact that exists objectively, which is the true face of the fact, not through subjective analysis, speculation or direct judgment, or even artificially forged. If there are contradictions or conflicts between evidences, which do not conform to common sense and logic, even if they are not forged, they cannot be used as evidence to prove the facts.

According to the actual situation of the case, the court can verify the authenticity of the evidence from these aspects: what are the reasons for the formation of the evidence; What was the environment and situation when the evidence was found; Whether the evidence is consistent with the original and the original needs to be accurately judged whether it is a copy of the original; Other factors that affect the authenticity of evidence, such as verifying whether the relevant personnel who provide evidence have an interest in the case.

What is the relevance of the evidence? It means that there should be a substantial connection between evidence and facts, not just an objective thing. There are many connections between general evidence and facts, among which the most common and important connection is causality, which is the key factor for case handlers to sort out the factual logic.

legal ground

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Procedure

Article 50 The people's court shall serve a notice of proof on the parties in the preparatory stage before the court session.

The notice of proof shall specify the distribution principle and requirements of the burden of proof, the circumstances in which you can apply to the people's court for investigation and collection of evidence, the time limit for proof specified by the people's court according to the circumstances of the case, and the legal consequences of providing evidence beyond the time limit.

Article 51 The time limit for adducing evidence may be negotiated by the parties and approved by the people's court.

If the people's court stipulates the time limit for adducing evidence, the ordinary procedure of first instance shall not be less than fifteen days, and the case of second instance in which the parties provide new evidence shall not be less than ten days. Cases tried by summary procedure shall not exceed fifteen days, and the time limit for giving evidence in small claims shall generally not exceed seven days.

After the expiration of the time limit for adducing evidence, if the parties provide rebuttal evidence or make corrections to the source and form of the evidence already provided, the people's court may, at its discretion, re-determine the time limit for adducing evidence, which is not limited by the time limit specified in the preceding paragraph.