However, the international Kelpolo School has formed two opposing factions, namely, the "affirmative faction" that affirmed Kelpolo's visit to China and the "skeptical faction" that suspected Kelpolo's visit to China. The two sides argued fiercely. In fact, this argument is of little significance. Speaking of Columbus, almost everyone knows that he discovered America. However, this is just the idea of our future generations. As far as Columbus himself is concerned, he thought to his death that he discovered India rather than America, so he insisted that the first land he saw near America during his voyage was the "West Indies". Columbus was not a liar, and Kyle Poirot didn't mean to lie. He may have only been to some countries in Central Asia. As Kronberg thought, he regarded these countries as China. But today, most people still believe that he has been to China.
Where is the solution to Kyle Poirot's problem? The key point is that we can't just study the so-called "Kyle Polo" in The Travels of Marco Polo. At present, scholars at home and abroad acknowledge that The Travels of Marco Polo has made great contributions to the development of communication between the East and the West. So why should we care who Kyle Poirot is? In fact, the name "Kyle Poirot" does not necessarily refer to a specific person, but to a group of pioneers in East-West traffic at that time. "Kelpolo" is synonymous with them, and The Travels of Marco Polo is a summary of their adventures at that time.