Literally, we should put wealth in people's hands. Why do we put food and wealth in a parallel position? It is precisely because ancient food was the basic cause of frequent natural and man-made disasters in ancient times that it was impossible to produce food in time, so people had to eat and live, so food was very important. For ordinary people, wealth is the foundation of life and the basic composition of the ability to cope with risks. So these two things are very important and put in the hands of the state.
As long as the people's quality of life has really improved, we must leave the wealth in the people's possession and put it in the people's possession. How much money does the government have? This is not the most critical factor, not to say that it is not important, but that people's living standards should be improved. Only when the money really reaches the people, and the money reaches him, can he have the freedom to buy what he needs, and his quality of life can be gradually improved. What does it mean if the people are poor and the poor do not have enough to eat and wear? This form of rule is doomed not to exist forever, because fundamentally, the interests of the country and the people should be the same.
People can gradually become rich and free, and live their own free life within a social framework. This society is basically stable, and this country can gradually develop rich and strong, because it is very simple. If you were you, would you like to study hard scientific and cultural knowledge every day and make contributions to social development? Of course not, so the distribution of wealth is very important, which has been the case since ancient times.