A History Book to Cai Heqing (Lin Qinnan's Letter to Cai Yumin)
Lin Shu (Lin Qinnan)
Mr. He Qing is the first step in history. After leaving the public for more than ten years, Lunzi began to meet each other in a hurry for eight years. I'm sorry I didn't talk to you. It's an insulting book with the inscription of Mr. Liu Yingqiu, a adherent. This book has not been published yet, so I can't read it. May I ask Zhao Jun to make up a short story? I want to write a postscript and return it. Oh! The Ming Dynasty was full of integrity, so many people died when they died, but Xia Feng, Lizhou, Lin Ting, Yangyuan and Erqu all escaped the axe, so they were lucky not to die. My princess, Zhang Xinxue, also misses the minister of broadcasting, which shows that Mingjiao is isolated. I really hope that my public will cherish its preservation and get the greatest comfort! Comfortable!
Although, I especially hope it is open. Universities are the model of the whole country and belong to the five permanent members. There have been many rumors recently, and my public will also hear about it, even my brother will not doubt it. Or there are people who are evil because they are too radical and they don't know the way to save the world. They should do what they can, and their words will be credible. If we do everything wrong and are not careful, then the poisoned porridge will get old, there will be rats with rotten intestines next to it, and insects will gather and die. who is it? Longing for sweetness makes it hot. If you miss it, you will never die. Today, when the Party is hopelessly unpopular, it even talks about innovation to make a big splash. Most teenagers leave school to benefit themselves, and no one disagrees, but China's life is like silk. At the end of the late Qing Dynasty, theorists all over the world always said, "If you go to the imperial examination, stop your qualification, abolish stereotyped writing, cut off the tail of a dolphin, restore your vitality, expel Manchu, jump on autocracy and reorganize your armaments, then China will be strong." Today, everything is successful, strong and safe? Therefore, it is faster to learn more from Confucius and Mencius and shovel ethics. Oh! Because the boy was trapped and didn't seek a good doctor, he blamed his two relatives for hiding. The boy became fatter every day. Is it reasonable? Foreign countries don't know Confucius and Mencius, but they are benevolent, brave, loyal, wise, humble and the way of the five permanent members. They never rebelled, but they bravely helped them. My brother doesn't know western languages. He wrote 19 years and translated 133 works, all of which are12 million words. In fact, he didn't see anything that violated the language of the P5. When did saints have this theory of betraying their loved ones and despising ethics, which won the attention of westerners? Why don't you teach me something?
I was Han, and I was in Hangzhou. Avoid disaster and work hard with your wife, but the purpose remains the same, so do the warriors. When Fang was on a business trip, my brother and Chen Shutong felt embarrassed about the business trip and didn't send it. Shen and Wu have the same interests, each doing his own thing. Today, when the public is advocating the Republic of China, my younger brother still knows the room very well. Friendship is solid, not ice charcoal. Therefore, insulting the apartment book and talking about Mr. Liu's preface and postscript are really clear and clear standards, and each has its own adherents, and its ambition cannot be separated. My brother is seventy years old. He is rich and famous. In the first thirty years, he thought it was a waste. Now that he is old, he still clings to his disability, and it is not easy to fuck him to death. The year before last, Liang Rengong advocated horse and class revolution, which was heard by my brother. Being a public servant is not bad. What kind of flattery is this? How many readers are there in Ma and Ban's books? There is almost no leather coat, so why spend this power at public expense?
If the dead words of clouds hinder academic development, ancient Chinese literature is not needed by science, nor does it hinder science. Britain's overlapping claims, Greece, Latin and Rome, are all dead things, but they still exist today. Although overlapping claims have a high reputation, we can't despise ancient times or our people with selfishness. Who else is like overlapping claims? You should know the truth of this world, and you can't take advantage of it, let alone take advantage of it. If Boyi and Shu Qisheng were today, there would be no remedy. Confucius called it "sacred time", and when the mine field was feudal, Zilu L would definitely make the mine field feudal without any abuses, and when it comes to submarine aircraft, Confucius would definitely make the submarine aircraft not kill people in vain, so it was named "sacred time". The time is right, not against the times. Ling Wei asked the array, and Confucius did it; Chen Heng regicide, Confucius begged. It's also a matter of time before soldiers are used. Today, we must say that the world is weaker than Confucius, but the world is stronger. Mo Qiang will fight against the world in William's corner, all of whom are defeated and helpless, and can be the ancestor of heroes in the world. Moreover, his literary martial arts, scientific business and crafts are all in Europe. Hu Weiwei is a Dutch resident? If the success or failure of the cloud is not a hero, how can you blame Confucius for being weak? Peter Zhuang's Zhou Shu is the most exclusive to Confucius, but there is a book on earth that also praises Confucius. The so-called "earthly life" can't be separated from people, that is, asking Yan Hui and Toyo Gongzi to ask Confucius, and referring to Chen's way of connecting people, so Zhuang Zhou won't mistreat Confucius. Ironically, however, scholars can't prove that they are Zhuang Zhou for more than a thousand years, but they can only prove that they are a lingering charm for less than a thousand years.
There is only real knowledge and morality in the world, which is unique and makes people follow. If ancient books are abandoned and written in vernacular Chinese, what people who drive cars and sell pulp are grammaticalized, unlike people in Guangzhou, Fujian who have no grammar. Accordingly, vendors in Beijing and Tianjin can be professors. If The Water Margin and The Red Chamber are both mythical things in the vernacular, and they are both books that are enough for teaching, I don't know that most of the words and kisses in The Water Margin were written by Jin Tuocui of York, and the Red Chamber was not written by only one person, and the authors were well-read. In a word, unless you read thousands of books, it can't be ancient prose, and it can't be vernacular. There is nothing wrong with making a speech if we turn the old saying into vernacular. According to Shuowen, acting skills are long-flowing and have extended meanings. Laws should be short and long, not short in vernacular. And let people read ancient books, they must read their own original works? Is one of the two languages to suppress lecturers an ancient child? If you read the original, you can't completely abolish the ancient prose. Besides the ancient philosophers, Qing is still teaching Shuowen. The study of Shuowen is not a vulgar book, as evidenced by Zhong Ding's writings. Think about using a brush seal to turn it into vernacular Chinese? In the vernacular, it is Huan and Yan in the Han and Tang dynasties, laughing and laughing with village women, and cups and beans from Chen, Shang and Zhou, gathering drinks for wild old people. Is it similar? Brothers, Fujian people and southerners are also willing to learn the language of the Central Plains. If I get rid of the language of the Central Plains, I will still speak Minnan, but what? Cover the quintessence of the country and give Shuowen as a gift, with Shuowen as the guest and vernacular as the main theme.
Recently, however, there is a so-called new morality, accusing parents of being self-emotional and ungrateful to themselves. At first glance, these words were written in the garden, but the servants thought that the meaning was neither fish nor fowl, denouncing Yuan Mei's madness and absurdity, but he didn't intend to be used by scholars. People are shouting, arguing for disdain, and buying is ok. He also said: Wu? As a holy king, Zhuo Wenjun is a famous lady, which is also Li Zhuowu's regret. Zhuo Wu has an animal behavior, so it is a statement; Li picked up the rest of the saliva, and dignity proved to be a loyal minister. Today, I want to ask Li Er's name. Can students give up? We are all wiped out, so why waste your breath? Pathetic!
Generally speaking, it is an example for scholars, so we should be flexible and stand in the middle, so that the rate can be harmless. If we rely on positions to divide power, we should educate those who are eccentric and eccentric. Only Muhammad can preach with a knife in his left hand and a missionary in his right hand as he wishes. Today, elders all over the country entrust their children to the public, and they hope that the public will pay attention to regularity. The world is drowning, and the disaster in the buffer zone is imminent, which has become a dispute between North and South America. My husband was forced by heather, and I should cry to help make peace, so that people's livelihood can be alleviated. It is because of the bow of the wind that the negotiator lost, which my husband cherishes very much.
After the book is published, you can not reply, but you can wait for a good voice to end its trend for the people. So, you are old and rebellious. You are lucky. Foolish words, ten thousand deaths! Ten thousand people are dead! Lin Shutong was the first.
Answer Lin Qinnan's book.
Cai Yuanpei
Write a letter to Bao and reply to the letter.
The reporter of Gong Yanbao took the lead:
Last month 18, I read your newspaper, and there was an article entitled "Please look at the recent changes in the ideological trend of Peking University", including a letter written by Lin to me. Although the original letter said "it is unnecessary to show summer", I have to correct it in order to show the truth of Peking University. I want to copy your reply to Lin Jun for your reference. In addition, your newspaper said that "Chen, Hu and others completely abandoned the old morality, destroyed ethics and despised Confucius and jars", which was based on your letter, and I also pointed out this in my letter. However, what is the basis of the statement that "French characters should be used as the national language rather than the national language"? Ask for a reply.
Write back to Lin Lingnan Jun as follows:
About Mr. Qin Nan:
I had to read a thank-you letter in Gong Yan Bao on 0/8 of this month and asked Mr. Liu Yingqiu to give a brief explanation. I remember the first time I sent a letter, I copied Zhao Jun's original letter, but I was afraid I couldn't reach it. I copied it specially, such as the inscription. Luckily. (Attached to Meng Yuan's letter to Zhao Ti) The official book is long and heavy, and it is deeply cherished by Peking University because of rumors from outside. But the rumor must not be a true record, and the public loves universities, so it is possible to correct it. According to this, there are many rumors today. Moreover, it is strange that people who are hard of hearing will believe rumors as records. Is it true that the public loves universities? There are only two things that Yuan Gong blamed: on the one hand, "building holes, enlightening and shoveling morality", and on the other hand, "scrapping ancient books and writing in vernacular". Please discuss it separately.
As for the first point, there are two kinds of surveys: (a) Has the teacher of Peking University ever taught students in the way of "Gai Kong Meng shovel ethics"? (b) Has Professor Peking University ever made any remarks outside the school?
Please look at the theory of The Way of Confucius and Mencius first. University handouts cover Confucius and Mencius, but only the history of China's philosophy. One book published is Hu Shizhi Junzhi's Outline of the History of Ancient Philosophy in China. Please read it carefully. Do you think it is a "pot with potholes"? The publisher of the special speech is Cui's Notes on the Analects of Confucius in the Spring and Autumn Period. In the aspect of philosophical research, Liang Shuming and Hu put forward the questions of "Similarities and Differences between Confucius and Mencius" and "Confucius in Ethical Research". Many people respect Confucius, but they prefer to hide it?
If university teachers are free to express their views outside the school, they can leave them alone. If we go further, we can infer that in New Youth magazine, there are occasional criticisms of Confucius' theory, but at first, it was not because of Confucius' theory and other people who attacked the new theory that they directly became enemies with Confucius. Is it fair or not? "When the mining field is feudal, Confucius can make the mining field feudal. As far as submersibles are concerned, Kong Yu will be able to prevent them from killing people in vain. Like Chen, Confucius did the same. Chen Heng regicide, Kong Lai please. Whether or not to use soldiers is also determined by time. " Even today, there is a saying that sticks to Confucius and thinks that the local system must be restored to feudal system; We must exchange personnel carriers for submarine planes: as soon as we hear that the Russians are dead, their emperor will be driven out by the Germans, but isn't it delicious to say that they must be asked? The meaning of "time" is Confucius' sinner. What should we exclude? On "shovel ethics", there are always five things: benevolence, righteousness, courtesy, wisdom and faith, which have been said by the public. There are five kinds of ethics: monarch and minister, father and son, brother, couple and friend. The relationship between monarch and minister was not suitable for the Republic of China. Other fathers and sons have relatives, brothers have friends (or young and old in an orderly way), husbands and wives are different, and friends have letters, which are all introduced in detail in the self-cultivation textbooks below middle school. There are not many people involved in university ethics, but no one ever treats father and son as strangers, brothers as brothers, husband and wife as equals and friends as unbelievers to teach students. If there are no female students in the university, people who pay attention to it will depend on men's moral integrity. In recent years, outside the Ministry of Education, a German association has been organized, in which two basic precepts are no whoring or concubinage. The ring of not whoring; Never betray the ancient ethics. If you don't marry a concubine, you will take Confucius and Mencius very seriously. As for the five permanent members, ethics stresses benevolence, freedom, order and avoiding fraud, and all science is aimed at enhancing knowledge. Do you want a shovel?
What if a university teacher publishes his "shovel ethics" outside the school? Then I want to ask who is the teacher, who has read any books and magazines, and who advocates the separation of father and son, brothers, husband and wife, and friends don't believe it? In which books and magazines have you preached unkindness, injustice, ignorance, unbelief and rudeness? CCBA said that "parents are accused of their lust and are ungrateful to themselves", which means that there are things in the garden, and my brother's recollection of the biography of Kong Rong in the Later Han Dynasty is full of nonsense. "The former Mi Heng in white said," What does a father have to do with him? As far as its original intention is concerned, it is actually lust; To the mother, but also ridicule? "For example, if you leave the bottle, you will stay." Kong Rong and Mi Fei didn't mean to denigrate their reputations, but what about the quintessence of Tao? And can the public point out which people, which teachers, and which books and magazines describe the essence of Tao or the language of the garden, and express their extreme approval? Besides, my brother has never heard of anyone or any teacher and worships Li Qi. He is willing to pick up his spit. As the saying goes, "Wu Zhao is a holy king and Zhuo Wenjun is a saint", what does Zeng Shusi's language mean and can it be made public?
For the second point. First of all, there are three kinds of investigations: (a) Did Peking University abandon ancient Chinese and devote itself to vernacular Chinese? (2) Can vernacular fruit reach the meaning of ancient books? (c) Is the vernacular advocated by a few university teachers equal to the language spoken by people who drive cars and sell pulp? Please check first "Did Peking University abandon ancient Chinese and specialize in vernacular Chinese?" There is a Chinese class in college preparatory course, which is based on textbooks, such as model essays and academic papers, all of which are ancient Chinese. His monthly exercises are all in classical Chinese. Undergraduate courses include China literature history, western literature history, China ancient literature, medieval literature and modern literature; Both undergraduate and preparatory courses have philology, and the printed handouts are all classical Chinese. In Peking University Monthly, there are also many works in classical Chinese. What can be called vernacular is Hu Shizhi's Outline of the History of Ancient Philosophy in China, in which most of the ancient books cited are original texts, not all of them are vernacular.
The second survey "Can vernacular Chinese reach the meaning of ancient books?" A lecture compiled by a university teacher. It's all classical Chinese. After you go to the pulpit, you must never blame you for reciting the handout. You must rely on oral English. Does it mean that all speeches must be written in classical Chinese before they can be used? When we were young, we read the notes of four books and thirteen classics, so that the teacher didn't have to speak in vernacular, but made similar notes, similar to classical Chinese notes. How can we solve it? If the vernacular is not enough to talk about Shuowen, ancient books and Zhong Ding's works, why not recite Xu's Shuowen Jiezi Zhuan, Guo's Khan Bamboo Slips and Xue's Notes on Zhong Ding from the rostrum, or make them into such classical Chinese, and never allow them to speak in vernacular?
Re-investigate whether the vernacular advocated by a few university teachers is equivalent to the vernacular spoken by drivers and sellers. Vernacular Chinese and classical Chinese are just different in form and content. The original text of evolution, Yi Fa, Fu Yuan, etc. They are all in vernacular Chinese, and Yan Youmujun translated them into classical Chinese. Is the function and Yan Jun's translation higher than the original? If the content is shallow, the examination papers in the school entrance examination and the comments in ordinary journals are worthless-can readers be better than vernacular Chinese? Besides, it's just an illiterate imperial clan in the Qing Dynasty. He can speak beautiful Beijing dialect, similar to Baoyu and Daiyu in A Dream of Red Mansions. Is his words valuable? Novelists who are keen on reading Water Margin and A Dream of Red Mansions can talk about science and philosophy in addition to continuing books such as Water Margin and A Dream of Red Mansions. It is said that the authors of Water Margin and Dream of Red Mansions are people who have read many books. In a word, they can't read thousands of books, nor can they write classical Chinese or vernacular Chinese. Really, really. Among the teachers in Peking University, Qian and Zhou are good at vernacular Chinese. Why can the public prove to be a person who is not a blogger, can't write ancient Chinese, and only hides others in vernacular Chinese? Hu Junjia is a sinologist. Although his old works are rare, in his Outline of China's Philosophical History, he said that he knew ancient books, which would not be published by the scholars in the Qing Dynasty. Lectures on Philology and General Theory of Learning written by Xing Jun are both elegant classical Chinese. Gu Zhuo's translation of Outside the City by Zhou Jun is profound, which is beyond the understanding of shallow scholars. However, why is Gong lenient towards the authors of The Water Margin and The Red Chamber, but harsh on Hu, Qian and Zhou?
As for my brother who went to college, I have the following two opinions:
(1) In theory, it imitates the common practice of universities all over the world, follows the principle of "freedom of thought" and adopts the principle of tolerance, which is quite different from CCBA's "four universes". No matter what school, people who are reasonable and stick to the truth and have not yet reached the fate of natural elimination, although they are at odds with each other, let them develop freely. This meaning has been said in the publication of the monthly magazine, and it is obvious plagiarism.
(2) For teachers, learning concepts is the main task. School teaching is based on the idea of not betraying the first category. Everything he says and does outside school is free to listen to, and our school never asks and cannot be responsible for it. For example, the restoration was also criticized by the Republic of China. Among the teachers in this school, there are those who have long braids and hold the restoration theory. They teach English literature and have nothing to do with politics, so they listen. The founder of the Preparatory Committee is also a sinner, and there are some teachers in this school. They regard what they teach as ancient literature, which has nothing to do with politics. Just listen. Whoring, gambling, concubinage, etc. The Dede Club in our school is forbidden. Among the teachers, there are poems that take concubinage and whoring as an affair and gambling as a pastime. If their homework is not barren and does not tempt students to fall, they will listen. Wives are hard to come by, and it is almost impossible to set up a school if it is perfect. There is a natural boundary between public and private. For example, Gong has translated La Traviata, Biography of Jia Yin, Painting on the Red Reef and other novels, and has also taught ancient Chinese and ethics in various schools, which makes some people look down on Gong's literature in these novel genres, and it is better to laugh at those who speak ethics by courtship, adultery and fighting for a married woman. But innovative schools, that is, occasionally radical theories, have nothing to do with school classes. Why should we impose the responsibility on schools? This reply, and waiting to play chess.
March 8, 2008/KLOC-0, Cai Yuanpei, Cheng.
(Originally published in Gong Yan Daily in April 19 19)