I finally know why Korean history is so ridiculous.

Every dynasty in China has a historical view that specializes in the history of the previous dynasty, and some dynasties also have classics that summarize the history of the previous thousands of years, such as Historical Records and Yongle Dadian. There was nothing in ancient Korea. What did a monk write in the Northern and Southern Dynasties? Even if it is ignored by unofficial history, it is regarded as an official view. Koreans thought that Emperor Taizong was a cyclops. Obviously, our old Tang books, new Tang books and Zi Tongzhi Jian are not recorded. It turns out that they were adapted from the scattered poems of Korean poets in the18th century ... Without history, they couldn't understand China's ancient books, so they had to rely on imaginary foreigners.