What are the top ten gates of the Forbidden City?

The first heavy door: Stealing the Door. The theft of exhibits from the Zhai Palace on 9 May exposed the problems in key links such as the closure and clearing of the Palace Museum, the setting of alarm facilities, the prediction of major crimes and related measures. The lesson is extremely painful. The leading group of the hospital made an in-depth inspection, investigated the responsibilities of leaders in charge of the hospital at all levels and relevant responsible persons, and made administrative warnings, demerits, gross demerits, dismissals, probation and other treatments in accordance with regulations to educate and warn myself and all cadres and workers. The second door: "misspelled door". On May 13, the banner presented by the Forbidden City to the Beijing Public Security Bureau was misspelled and its reputation was seriously damaged. The incident occurred in specific departments and contractors, and the root cause was hospital leaders. The appearance of typos and the reaction of the parties have become hot spots in the media. After it turns into a public emergency, if you immediately admit your mistake openly and sincerely, it will help the society understand. Because the error correction is not timely and decisive, the responsibility lies with subordinates, which has aroused widespread criticism from all walks of life. The third door: "club door". On May 14, the so-called Fu Jian Palace Club broke out, and the Forbidden City has conducted an investigation and clarified it to the society. The leaders of the Palace Museum have never proposed to open any clubs in the Palace Museum. Fu Jian Palace Garden rebuilt on the ruins of fire is mainly used for holding press conferences, small exhibitions, public cultural activities and receiving important state guests. In view of the serious violation of the agreement by the partner Beijing Forbidden City Palace Culture Development Co., Ltd., our hospital has instructed it to suspend business for rectification, terminate and modify the agreement. Due to the lax supervision of the cooperative company, our institute failed to detect the behavior of its private membership in violation of the agreement, especially in the case that it has become a hot topic in the network and media, and failed to find out the situation and explain it clearly at the first time, which led to the expansion of the inquiry and superimposed with the theft of exhibits, typos of banners and other issues, resulting in a very passive situation. The fourth heavy door: The Broken Door of Geyao Porcelain. On July 4th, a national first-class product "Geyao green glazed sunflower petal mouth plate" was damaged. The reason has been found out and made public. The lesson of this incident is that the early implementation plan of cultural relics protection is not careful enough, the foresight is not enough, and the personnel training is not targeted enough, which leads to the damage of precious cultural relics. I have an unshirkable responsibility for not reporting to my superiors at the first time afterwards. The fifth door: "the door to report the damage of cultural relics." On August 2nd, netizen "Long Can" Weibo broke the news that there had been four incidents of cultural relics wounding in the Forbidden City. One is about "throwing away more than 10 Buddha statues when throwing away abandoned wooden boxes, and sending them back by other units". On June 9th, 2006, two employees of the Ministry of Palace collected a batch of 16 (unclassified) black painted gold pebbles stored under the benzene board at the bottom of the wooden box in the ancient building repair center of the hospital together with the wooden box when transporting the wooden box for transporting cultural relics. Sun Huisheng, an employee of the Palace Museum Repair Center who was working at that time, properly protected the cultural relics and promptly informed the relevant departments to retrieve them immediately. After comprehensive inspection, it was confirmed that no other articles were lost, and no new damage was found in 16 chip chime. According to the Regulations on the Collection Management of the Palace Museum, the main responsible person was punished. The second is about "man-made damage to the first-class instrument in Ming Dynasty around 2006". After investigation, there is no first-class cultural relic ritual vessel in the Palace Museum. Expand the scope of investigation. On May 27th and September 6th, 2004, two employees of the Palace Department were sorting out and counting cultural relics, which caused damage to the yellow glazed lamp (ungraded) cover and the green pastel "fish" (ungraded) base of the Qing Dynasty. These two incidents were caused by the violation of cultural relics operation regulations by the parties concerned. The museum punished the parties according to the relevant regulations. The third is about "the second-class Buddha statue in the former site of the Buddhist temple was damaged in 2008". After investigation, the Palace Museum has not had an accident of damage to the original Buddhist temple cultural relics for many years. The fourth is about the situation that "Director Ren Wanping's underarm was broken without such a heavy history". In 2009, the palace carried a pair of glass flower arrangements (not classified) in the late Qing Dynasty, and later found that the 1 flower arrangement 1 glass branch was broken. The hospital found that the work of the palace department did not violate the operating norms, but the plan was not detailed enough and the consideration was not comprehensive enough, so it was instructed to make inspection instructions and submit them to the hospital for the record. The sixth heavy door: "hanging screen bubble door" 2011June 15, the palace staff sent a rosewood hanging screen inlaid with jade and flowers and birds (unclassified) to the lacquer mosaic room of the comprehensive technology department of the Ministry of Culture, Science and Technology for dust removal and repair. The object itself is damaged. On the morning of July 25, the staff found a small crack at the tap water pipe interface, which made the cotton pad covered on the hanging net wet by some scattered water drops and infiltrated into the hanging net. Relevant experts went to the site to inspect this cultural relic, and agreed that there was no new damage to the hanging screen due to water. At the same time, it is recommended to carefully check the loose inserts and reinforce the loose inserts caused by the aging of the adhesive. The seventh heavy door: "the sealed door for dividing the fare." In mid-July, 2009, the Discipline Inspection and Supervision Office of the Palace Museum received a tip-off, which reflected that the staff at the Wumen Gate of the Palace Museum colluded with illegal tour guides in the society, taking advantage of their work convenience to let the tour group visit the Palace Museum privately, and obtained illegal benefits from it. They claimed that the video materials could help the Palace Museum capture this person, but they asked the Palace Museum to give a reward of 654.38+0.5 million yuan for the tip-off, otherwise no evidence would be provided. In order to find out the problem as soon as possible and not cause greater economic losses to the country, after repeated consultations Under the joint action of the Security Office of Tiananmen Branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau and the police station in the Forbidden City, on the morning of August 1 1, 2009, with the cooperation of the reporter, a tour group of 130 people who entered the Forbidden City with expired tickets was intercepted at the ticket gate of the East Gate of the Forbidden City, and the relevant parties were arrested, and the stolen money was 7660 yuan. Because the evidence information provided by the informant is true, and the hospital and the public security department have successfully arrested him, the reward fee for reporting will be paid to the informant from the fund with reference to the hospital's regulations on reward for smuggling. The eighth door: "Song people believe in benefits." 1997, Beijing Hanhai Auction Co., Ltd. took 5 letters of Song people on the spring auction. At that time, Mr. Xu Bangda, a famous appraiser of calligraphy and painting, wrote to the higher authorities to suggest the acquisition. After performing the demonstration procedure, our hospital contacted the auction company, and the media reported it at that time. The use of this fund to purchase cultural relics must be applied to the higher authorities, but the acquisition has not been realized because it has not been approved. The book "Eighty Years of the Palace Museum" published by the Palace Museum in 2005 and the column "Chronicle of Academy History" in official website recorded the acquisition. Now, it is found out that this is the result that the application for funds was wrongly based on the documents submitted at that time when sorting out the historical memorabilia of the academy and consulting the official documents, and finally the application for funds was not approved and could not be purchased. Gate 9: "The Palace Museum lost ancient books". In the past seven years, in the process of cleaning up ancient books, the Forbidden City has required that all doubts found must be recorded. According to the statistics of periodicals in 2009, about 200,000 volumes (including ordinary ancient books, thread-bound books and printed materials) still have more than 100 volumes. Because it involves historical issues that have lasted for more than half a century since 1950, the situation is more complicated. At that time, it was decided to record the doubts in stages and continue the inventory. I haven't stopped yet, and I still can't draw a lost conclusion. However, once the loss and the responsible person are clearly defined, they will be dealt with according to the law. The tenth heavy door: "the tax evasion door of the Western Super Exhibition outside the terminal door". Duanmen area did not belong to the management of the Forbidden City in the past, and the exhibitions held by these merchants have existed for many years. At present, the Forbidden City is still taking back the houses used by these merchants, and it is clear that after all reception, it will be transformed into an audience service area such as ticket sales, consultation and guidance, and no exhibitions will be held.