I'm not qualified to discuss it.
However, the destruction of public property by * * * was also appreciated and compiled into a book.
Personally, I disagree. Historically,
Most poets
calligrapher
Have written their own works in public places.
He even carved his works on stones. As far as the word "destruction" is concerned,
They are even better than Ceng Zaocai. If they do well in their studies,
They are calligraphers.
Poets have power. I have no objection. But have you ever thought?
aesthetical standard
as one gets older
Customs will change greatly. Van Gogh's paintings
And home is billions.
But when he was alive,
I can't sell any photos. Life is poor.
thus it can be seen that
A few years later
Mr Ceng Zaocai may be the second Van Gogh. (or
This is a "privilege" and will be added in the future ...) 2008-12-0314: 08: 30 Supplement: In addition,
I admire him.
At least, I will stick to my faith until death do us part. but I
You can only "eat" this thing first. You can stick to it until the end, ..........! !
Reference: Blow water by yourself
Self-deprecating people should be insightful!
Graffiti, of course
Probably the same as graffiti abroad, can it be classified as? I am not qualified as an art critic to comment on Mr. Ceng Zaocai's calligraphy achievements.
However, it is undeniable that there are many personalities in his masterpieces, whether they are arranged in the same font or not.
But I absolutely disapprove of leaving it in public places. As for compiling his works into books, I think it is a problem.
Better than that? D has the ability to turn all good things into bad things.
But don't dare to write newspapers and magazines that are poor and rich (for fear of being sued by others), ok? Besides, Mr Ceng Zaocai has gone to find the fairy.
be lax
Forget it!
Reference: myself
Mr Ceng Zaocai's handwriting must be unique. However, writing casually in public places is definitely graffiti.