What is the general meaning of this principle?

What is the principle? I always think that this is a positive "character" and a manifestation of justice. > The principle has two meanings. First of all, the principles or standards of speech or action: principles, issues of principle, adherence to principles, basic principles, etc. It is the most typical usage of this meaning. Second, it refers to the general aspects; For example, on the whole, he basically agreed with the plan, but put forward some specific suggestions on individual details. Whether it is this or that, the principle is grand, and it is definitely a "positive role", just like the literary works during the Cultural Revolution. As soon as the "principle" appeared, even children knew that he was a "good man"! Principles, artificially formulated, are "powerful" groups or ruling groups, which are used to bind people's standards of speech or action. I have some ideas about principles. First, principles are sometimes very principled. Mao Dun's literary works & gt have a character named Zhang. This man is a first-class man. Everything he said and did adhered to principles until his death. The novel has two sides to Zhang, even a little "black humor", so it arranges the "Jiang Daya" of the first protagonist, teasing him in every way, calling Zhang "Zhang" is called "Zhang", and there is also the shadow of "principle" everywhere. I understand that the author denies "principles", or at least holds "reserved" opinions. The principle needs to be adhered to, and it is "Zhang Kesi". Second, principles are sometimes stubborn. The reason why we use the word "stubbornness" is because of principle. Going beyond what should have been "digested internally" is now called "going beyond petitioning". As a result, not only the leaders, comrades, but also themselves were harmed, which made readers feel sorry. Recently, I wrote a few miscellaneous articles, with no purpose, but just wanted to talk about the feelings of reading Zhu Xinjian. As soon as it was posted on < < China Calligraphers Forum >, several netizens "questioned" and even "condemned". I understand that these netizens meant no harm, but my remarks "hurt" their "principles". But it's hard to convince him! Third, principles sometimes do great harm to people. I feel that in an "authoritarian" society, principles are very principled. If there is no principle, it is almost "self-destruction". In a "democratic" society, "principle" is almost derogatory. "principle" means not understanding "flexibility", that is, "stubbornness", that is ". That is, "stick to principles." In China's democratic society, if you want your descendants to be out of tune with this society, the most effective way is to educate them: stick to principles! Fourth, principles are sometimes annoying. For example, collection, because of the existence of principles, many people do not want to have temperament. They obviously "like" this style, but they dare not "admit"; Clearly "like" works, dare not "applaud"; I dare not "win" an obvious "greedy" object! Even cynicism against one's will, a look of "grandfather of Marxism-Leninism" or "old lady of Marxism-Leninism"! Tired, I am tired for him (her)! Fifth, principles are sometimes boring. There are thousands of painters in China. Faced with today's "diversified" needs, how boring and boring are these thousands of painters facing the audience and collectors like a sunflower? Netizens who feel too "intense" about Zhu Xinjian's works should really reflect on themselves. Is it too "principled"? Don't say that facing Zhu's flowers and birds landscape, even facing Zhu's "beauty map" is not a "beauty map", is it worth making a fuss about? My series of essays on "Zhu Xinjian and the Great Hall of the People" really just want to talk about some ideas, and have no other meaning. Anyway, what does it matter to me if Zhu Xinjian can't enter the Great Hall of the People? Welcome to ask questions,