First of all, because the inscription and postscript are written in different chronological order, the inscription and postscript are not necessarily arranged in chronological order. For example, the second inscription and postscript written during the Xuande period in the Map of Huang You and Dai Sheng is in the middle, while the two inscriptions and postscript written by Ni Zan and Yongle in the first five years are around. However, this is not important. Although the order of inscription and postscript will be considered in calligraphy and painting appreciation, it will not be used as a standard to distinguish authenticity.
Having made this clear, let's look at the specific content of the inscription. The second inscription written by Xuanderenzi says, "For Niyuan Town?" And after that? The topic is twenty-six years ago "(limited knowledge, some calligraphy fonts can't be understood,? Obviously, his statement corresponds to the previous two inscriptions. In terms of time, Hu Yan's inscription was written in the fifth year of Yongle, that is, 1407, while Xuanderen's word was 1433, with a difference of exactly 26 years, which is correct in historical expression and time line. Secondly, there is a cloud at the end of Xuande's inscription: "Because of the complexity of the topic, it shows the cloud of future generations. "The word" internal end "shows that the author has understood his position when writing inscriptions and postscript.
For this reason, the reason for personal partiality is that the writing position of predecessors' inscriptions has been fixed, leaving only room in the middle. Therefore, it is not that the epitaph writers in Xuande period are unwilling to play cards according to the routine, but are limited by reality, and deliberately show that their writing position is "inner end".
I hope I can help you.