How to evaluate Tian Yingzhang's regular script?

Let's talk about the shortcomings of Ertian's regular script:

1, lack of change.

The brushwork has not changed, and the structure also has this problem.

2, too gentle and lovely.

As we know, the two characteristics of European character style are danger and beauty.

There are many shortcomings in his calligraphy, and he himself, including his younger brother Tian, frankly admits that their calligraphy is far from perfect. However, it is not without reason that so many people learn from Tian Jie. Of course, it also has his advantages.

1, profound skill.

We say that his calligraphy lacks change, but again, it is also a manifestation of profound skill, which is comparable to that of non-amateurs. After decades of hard training, people are not convinced.

I think this is obvious to all.

2, stippling is exquisite and dignified.

His stippling, structure and other problems mentioned above are compared with those recognized calligraphy masters in history, but if measured by the level of contemporary calligraphy, Tian's regular script is definitely not as good as those ugly books of Jianghu School and Innovative School.

3. Easy to use.

It is extremely difficult to learn from Ou Kai. Countless people have come to Europe in history, but besides Ou Yangxun, who else is known as "the best regular script" and "the crown of Tang Kai"?

For beginners, especially without the guidance of teachers, they can hardly find the direction, so looking at Jiuchenggong's copybook is naturally at a loss.

However, Tian Kai is a good bridge. At this time, it is easier to master the lack of changes, which is much easier for novices.

4. The promotion effect is remarkable.

The advantage of his calligraphy is that it is easily accepted by the public.

But what I want to say is more about his contribution to promoting Ou Kai and calligraphy.

Finally, I want to make it clear that many of the above conclusions are not supported by specific data and strict arguments, but just a family view for your reference and discussion.