Although he is one of the famous three-trace writers in ancient Japan, his works are of high artistry, but compared with famous Japanese writers, he is always inferior. In addition, there is no China culture in his blood, and the connotation of calligraphy is much more monotonous than that of ancient calligraphers in China. For example, if you look at Su Shi's calligraphy, you can know that he has a high literary talent and broad-minded temperament. You can appreciate many things.
But reading Fujiwara's book is not the case.
It is better to learn from Japanese calligraphers than to learn from national practicality. You can refer to it, but don't overdo it. The origin of calligraphy is in China.
Is it necessary to understand the interpretation of his calligraphy?