However, according to Confucius' thought of "the nobility and the lowliness are orderly", he maintained the rites of the Zhou Dynasty, so the nobility and the lowliness are orderly, the strong are orderly and prosperous, and the weak are orderly. If we infer from this level, plus the Confucian concept of "righteousness" is a norm of ideological form. According to this meaning, it should be emphasized that the strong should maintain their own strength and the weak should be self-sufficient.
Another, the Spring and Autumn Period in which Confucius lived was an age of irreconcilable contradictions between underground rivers. He reformed the traditional culture appropriately in order to establish a new harmonious order and psychological balance in social practice, and it finally worked. Mencius also said: "sharp, slow also." My inference is that he doesn't approve of the weak becoming stronger quickly, but he also said, "If you are shameless, who is there?" So the answer should come out.
-Confucianism believes that the strong should maintain their own strength and the weak should promote leap on the basis of self-sufficiency.
Buddhism, Buddhism, I am here according to the Zen thought of Han Buddhism.
But first you should know that Buddhism and Buddhism are not exactly the same. Buddhism is a general term for Buddhist theories and learners.
Buddhists pay attention to meditation, understanding and fate. When fate came, they came. When fate ended, they left. Buddhists generally meditate. Without meditation, they are easily extreme. What they emphasize is "emptiness". The most famous poem of Huineng, the sixth ancestor, "Bodhi has no trees, the mirror is not a stage, and there is nothing. Where can it cause dust? " Since the origin exists, the self is empty, empty. What is stronger and what is weaker? Therefore, there is no difference between strength and weakness.
"Heart Sutra" also says that "the heart is like running water, but there is not much stop for a minute", and it is illusory and constantly changing to connect with the heart. Where is something that will last forever?
Therefore, the Buddhist view is that there is neither constant strength nor constant weakness.
Taoism is not Taoism either. In Laozi, "the wind never ends in the morning, and the rain never ends all day". Nothing can go against the purpose of the laws of nature. Your strength and your weakness should follow the laws of nature, whether it is constant or not.
I'm sorry for what Taoist said, but that's probably what I meant there, because Laozi advocated obeying the laws of nature. I don't know much about Taoism, and I have a shallow understanding. Maybe my answer about Taoism is a little rough.
These are just some of my views, I hope you can refer to them.