The first time I got to know Mu Xin was from his poem "Once Upon a Time Slow". Like reading the masterpieces handed down from history - when I read "Walking to a waterless place and sitting down to watch the clouds rise", I had to figure out that it was written by Wang Wei; when I read "The light rain in the sky street is as moist as crisp, the grass is far away." "Looking close but not seeing anything", I had to know that it was Han Yu's creation before I would give up - reading "The sun in the past has become slower/cars, horses and mails are slower/there is only enough time to love one person in a lifetime" - I got See which great immortal the author is. In this way, Mr. Mu Xin came into my sight.
But that’s all. Later I learned about Mr. Chen Danqing, his disciple. Mr. Chen gave me the impression that he speaks for justice. He has many insights that influence me, and I trust Mr. Chen’s words. After checking the information, I learned that it was Chen Danqing who brought his teacher, Mr. Mu Xin, to mainland readers. He listened to his lecture on the history of world literature in New York and followed him on a five-year "literary expedition." " Later, Chen Danqing compiled five volumes of lecture notes recorded in those five years and turned it into a large book with eighty-five lectures and more than 400,000 words. As a result, Mr. Wang was able to meet readers from Mainland China.
As for Mu Xin, I have never seriously read any of his writings before. Until today, I saw my husband's "Qiongmeika Caprices", so I plunged into it and experienced a special kind of boundless breadth and beauty. I have to say that it is a kind of mental sedative. Because every line in the words reflects the gentleman's calmness and calmness after traveling through thousands of mountains and rivers, and all reflects his casualness and tranquility after going through hardships and hardships.
The teacher said that people who are not humble but crazy are not crazy; people who are not crazy but humble really don’t know what they are being modest about. This sentence tells people how to identify madmen in life. As the saying goes, "Young people have their own youthful madness" and "Young people are in vain if they are not crazy." It means that young people should be arrogant, but the madness of young people lies in their ignorance and fearlessness. This is not madness in the true sense. In this way, it is just Encourage young people to question authority and respect for their elders, follow their hearts, and dare to be themselves. Being arrogant often requires capital. Arrogant people often rely on their own talents, and they are unrestrained because of their talents. If you want your madness to be like that, you have to be more modest. If a person only has madness but no humility, it will be terrible. Modesty and madness arise in opposition to each other. Madness is flamboyant to the outside world, while humility is restrained to the outside world, but they are both techniques for showing off to others. In my opinion, modesty depends on madness. Otherwise, what would a person who is modest but not mad be modest about?
The teacher said that a hero's missteps and a beauty's loss of virginity often occur in this moment, a moment when the boundaries between consciousness and subconsciousness are blurred, and a moment when one cannot help it. The teacher's words talk about a special moment that everyone may encounter - making a mistake and losing one's virginity. What kind of situation is this? Human qualities are often shown at critical moments, but they are often formed in insignificant places. What is this critical moment? It is what the teacher calls "the moment when the boundaries between consciousness and subconsciousness are blurred." At this time, people can no longer control themselves. What doesn't matter is that in the moment of conscious or unconscious practice, oneself are tempered and refined according to a recognized moral code and industry standard.
The teacher said that personality is style. I understand that the concept of style here, in current vulgar terms, is similar to the word character. That is, a person's consistent style and characteristics of doing things in the eyes of others. Mr. Wang believes that the styles of artists in the past were formed slowly, developed naturally, were influenced by the essence of the sun and the moon, and were naturally free and loose. Nowadays, time flies so fast, material and spiritual convection is fierce, and artists cannot form their own style. From this I thought of my career. There is a bowl of chicken soup that says that teachers should use their personality charm to infect students. The question is, in today's mindless life, how many teachers can still develop their own charisma and use their so-called charisma to deceive young people? I'm afraid it's because of the lack of personality and lack of charm.
The teacher said that intelligence is a kind of elasticity, and those who stretch it tightly from morning to night are undoubtedly fools. This sentence is heartbreaking. People who go to work in a hurry, children who get up early and stay late, and migrant workers who are sometimes unemployed and sometimes employed, are like marching and fighting every day, charging into battle, and their nerves can't be more tense, like a boxer fighting in the boxing ring, fighting. He keeps his fist stretched out like this, moving forward bravely. What is this if he isn't a fool? According to Mr. Wang, we have now entered a unit where idiots emerge in large numbers, or a stage where idiots are mass-produced. This is true.
Mr. is an artist with supreme attainments, and all he talks about is his evaluation or thinking about art. And I was just an ignorant child playing at the beach. I accidentally ran into an artistic maze and couldn't get enough of it. Presuming good intentions and scribbling are not enough to express my admiration for Mr.