Item can't hear it at the same time, so he can understand it. People-oriented, you can gain or lose. Liu bang did it. Xiang Yu didn't do it at all.
Taking history as a mirror, we can know the rise and fall. And Liu bang did it. Xiang Yu didn't do it at all. The enfeoffment system is a retrogression in history. The warlord regime will lead to chaos in the world. The conquest of territory by vassals will lead to endless civil war and endless war. The princes fought unjustly for territory. It causes people to be displaced. The soldiers were bleeding like rivers. The unification of China by Qin was in line with the historical trend. Qin's ignorance, treachery, poverty and luxury overwhelmed this country. So I died. Destroy the six countries, and the six countries are also not Qin; Qin is also a Qin family, not the world. Ha ha! Make the six countries love each other, enough to refuse Qin; Let the state of Qin love the six countries again, and give it to three generations to be king forever. Who wins and who dies? Qin people feel sorry for themselves, and later people mourn for them; Later generations grieved, failed to learn from it, and let future generations mourn for future generations. Similarly: Xiang Yu, Xiang Yu, not Liu Bang. If the item is meritocratic and elegant, why give up the county enfeoffment system?
(Xiang Yu lost to Liu Bang. But Xiang Yu is good at fighting. The battle of Julu wiped out Qin Jun's main force, which illustrates this point. Xiang Yu also knew how to stick to the battle of Xingyang. Xiang Yu doesn't know how to choose people. So Xiang Yu is a general. And Han Xin ambushed Xiang Yu on all sides, so Han Xin was also a generalship. But on martial arts, Han Xin is inferior to Xiang Yu. So Xiang Yu and Han Xin are roughly equal.
Besides, why did Shuai say that Han Xin was much taller than Xiang Yu? There is a simple reason. Liu Bang once asked Han Xin: How many soldiers can I take to fight? Han Xin said: 100,000. Liu bang asked again: then how many soldiers can you take to fight? Han Xin said: The more the better, the more the better. Liu bang is stupid. Han Xin said, master, you are always in charge of the generals. I am the commander of the army. This shows that Liu Bang regards talents as the backbone of the country. In the process of strategizing, we won the victory of a famous minister and a good general thousands of miles away. The talents in Han Xin are the warriors who defend their country and the heroes who take the lead. Xiang Yu is a pillar of a country. In the process of planning, a famous minister and elite soldier who is thousands of miles away, such as Fan Zeng, or a warrior who defends the country, cannot be regarded as a hero who takes the lead, such as Zhong Limei. So Xiang Yu lost. If Xiang Yu is attributed to Fan Zeng, Liu Bang will be destroyed, and Xiang Yu will be attributed to Zhong Limei to keep Xingyang. Unfortunately, Xiang Yu was useless, so Xiang Yu lost.
On Emperor Wang Zhidao, Xiang Yu and Han Xin are not as good as Liu Bang. Xiang Yu's defeat was not only in Han Xin. While Han Xin, Xiao He, Sean and Chen Ping, generals and counselors, worked together with Qi Xin. It was Liu Bang who brought these famous ministers and generals together and let them do their jobs according to their abilities. Liu bang was good at employing people, so he won the final success.
So in a word, Xiang Yu is a good general and vanguard officer, but he is not a good marshal, let alone a wise emperor.
Although Han Xin was not a good pioneer and Han Xin was a good general and marshal, he was not a wise emperor.
Liu Bang can't be a pioneer officer, a general or a marshal, but he is definitely a wise emperor.
That depends on how you look at these two people. On the whole, the two are evenly matched; On the commander, Han Xin is far higher than Xiang Yu; Emperor, Wang Zhidao, Xiang Yu and Han Xin are all inferior to Liu Bang. What is a general? Is to lead troops to fight. Xiang Yu lost to Liu Bang. But Xiang Yu is good at fighting. The battle of Julu wiped out Qin Jun's main force, which illustrates this point. Xiang Yu also knew how to stick to the battle of Xingyang. Xiang Yu doesn't know how to choose people. So Xiang Yu is a general. And Han Xin ambushed Xiang Yu on all sides, so Han Xin was also a generalship. But on martial arts, Han Xin is inferior to Xiang Yu. So Xiang Yu and Han Xin are roughly equal. Besides, why did Shuai say that Han Xin was much taller than Xiang Yu? There is a simple reason. Liu Bang once asked Han Xin: How many soldiers can I take to fight? Han Xin said: 100,000. Liu bang asked again: then how many soldiers can you take to fight? Han Xin said: The more the better, the more the better. Liu bang is stupid. Han Xin said, master, you are always in charge of the generals. I am the commander of the army. This shows that Liu Bang regards talents as the backbone of the country. In the process of strategizing, we won the victory of a famous minister and a good general thousands of miles away. The talents in Han Xin are the warriors who defend their country and the heroes who take the lead. Xiang Yu is a pillar of a country. In the process of planning, a famous minister and elite soldier who is thousands of miles away, such as Fan Zeng, or a warrior who defends the country, cannot be regarded as a hero who takes the lead, such as Zhong Limei. So Xiang Yu lost. If Xiang Yu is attributed to Fan Zeng, Liu Bang will be destroyed, and Xiang Yu will be attributed to Zhong Limei to keep Xingyang. Unfortunately, Xiang Yu was useless, so Xiang Yu lost. On Emperor Wang Zhidao, Xiang Yu and Han Xin are not as good as Liu Bang. Xiang Yu's defeat was not only in Han Xin. While Han Xin, Xiao He, Sean and Chen Ping, generals and counselors, worked together with Qi Xin. It was Liu Bang who brought these famous ministers and generals together and let them do their jobs according to their abilities. Liu bang was good at employing people, so he won the final success. So in a word, Xiang Yu is a good general and vanguard officer, but he is not a good marshal, let alone a wise emperor. Although Han Xin was not a good pioneer and Han Xin was a good general and marshal, he was not a wise emperor. Liu Bang can't be a pioneer officer, a general or a marshal, but he is definitely a wise emperor. Xiang Yu in history was not satisfied with being a general. If Xiang Yu was just a general who fought a decisive battle, I believe his achievements were no less than those of Wei Qing, Huo Qubing, Lian Po, Li Mu, Wang Jian and even Sun Wu, Sun Bin, Yue Fei, Guan Yu, Zhang Fei and Xue. But who is Xiang Yu? Just a war general? When Xiang Yu saw Qin Shihuang's honor guard, Xiang Yu stood in the crowd and looked at Qin Shihuang and said, "He can replace him!" " "After the qin dynasty, xiang yu claimed to be the place of overlord. Xiang Yu is the overlord of Chu, equivalent to an emperor rather than a general. Xiang Yu should be qualified as a general, but not as an emperor. Xiang Yu is good at fighting. But being good at fighting is only tactical, so Xiang can be said to be a tactician. But the key to war is strategy. Han Xin may not be as good as Xiang Yu in tactics. But Han Xin was able to assess the situation and had a strategic vision, so Han Xin finally defeated Xiang Yu. So Han Xin is a strategist. Although Liu Bang has no strategic vision, he does not understand the art of war and tactics. But he knows that talent is the best choice, and he can be good at employing people and make the best use of them. So he can be a leader, an emperor and a great politician. So Liu Bang is a qualified emperor. Xiang Yu is just a qualified general and Han Xin is a qualified marshal. The tragedy of Xiang Yu is that although he is a qualified general, he doesn't want to be just a general, but he wants to be the overlord of the land of Chu. This is Xiang Yu's fatal mistake. Originally, he was not qualified to be the overlord of Chu, who violated the historical process. Since Qin Shihuang unified China, China should adopt a unified county system. But Xiang Yu just wants to pack and regress, and Xiang Yu is doomed to fail if he moves against the historical trend! )