? In terms of "implementation", Mr. Ming covers the author's introduction, data link, preview check, reading comprehension, dredging the meaning of the text, intensive reading, accumulation of classical Chinese, extracurricular expansion and other aspects, but the large classroom capacity will cause a problem-average effort, and that difficulty will not be prominent. Teacher Ming used various forms in her reading, but she didn't read enough. Such a short article can be practiced more. In terms of dredging the meaning of the text, the courseware is beautifully made, showing all the notes in the text. However, after sentence-by-sentence translation, students are not trained to coordinate the translation of the whole article, which is too fragmentary. You can add a link to let students tell stories in their own words. You can practice at the same table first, and then tell stories at random. For the accumulation of classical Chinese, Mr. Ming has done a solid job, focusing on difficult words such as "ambition", "sudden" and "different", as well as polysemy and inversion sentences. However, Mr. Ming's whole class is mainly based on cross talk, completely putting himself in the main body of the class, leaving no room for students to think and grow. We should reflect on it. Do we have to talk a lot about knowledge? Do we give students enough time to think and practice?
? On the "key point", due to the excess of knowledge in the classroom, we failed to grasp the key points and difficulties, and the three questions and answers in the article were not discussed too much.
? When explaining which answer is better, Teacher Ming used the way of asking questions. Just after finishing sorting out the contents, he suddenly asked a question: Why are sons and nephews like Xie Daowen and Xie Lang so excellent? Hearing this question, I was at a loss. The change is too sudden. There are many reasons for being "excellent", but I think it is a bit stiff from the family atmosphere and the love of the elders. The second question-what is the significance of explaining Xie Daowen's identity at the end of the article? The students couldn't answer either. Finally, the teacher added that the author appreciated Xie Daowen's talent, and then focused on the third question-which do you think is better, Sprinkling Salt or Catkin? I don't think it is appropriate to put this question in the third question, because the first two questions have paved the way for Xie An and the author to appreciate Xie Daowen's answer. Everyone has herd mentality. Even the two great men said that Xie Daowen was very good. How do students find another way to say "sprinkle salt"? It might be better if we put this problem first. Then I introduced the art of metaphor. I think this part is too complicated. I borrowed so many poems for students to read that I completely forgot. In fact, this part can be used to appreciate the answers of Xie Lang and Xie Daowen. A good metaphor should be "decent, interesting, affectionate and honest", and then ask the students to compare which metaphor is better.
? Finally, in terms of time arrangement, I calculated the time and it took 10 minutes to import. This import is not normal. I didn't spend my time at the forefront. I later previewed the examination for 5 minutes, read the text for 6 minutes, combed the meaning for 5 minutes, and intensively read 14 minutes. After class is over, I'm still talking about that snowy poem. Later, the accumulation of classical Chinese and extracurricular expansion were just pulling courseware. Learn to slim down the classroom and boldly give up what students can't understand or don't have to say for the time being. Focus on the key content, last lesson, don't be greedy.
? Teacher Ming learned a lot from this course. She must have spent a lot of time and energy looking for information for this course. The courseware is made with great care and exquisiteness. Communicate more in the future, so that our teaching level can be improved!