Pei Li's Media Experience

The media has two basic skills, one is to ask questions, and the other is to listen. I have been doing these two courses for more than ten years. From government officials who live in temples to ordinary people who drive cars and sell pulp, they are all good teachers and friends who help me finish my homework. Since the publication of China Reform Newspaper Leaders Weekly in 2004, questioning and listening seem to be more professional. It must be boring to program a chat that should be easy, which is definitely not my intention. So the "editor's living room" on the page opened, and I am the owner of this living room. Try to ask as easily as possible and listen happily. Li Yining, a famous economist, Ji Baocheng, former vice president of the Central Party School and president of China Renmin University, Li Shouxin, director of the Planning Department of the National Development and Reform Commission, Cai, director of the Department of Basic Industries and Agriculture and Economics, Zheng, president of the Palace Museum, Feng Yuan, vice chairman of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles, chairman of the China Calligraphers Association and president of Microsoft China are all frequent visitors to the reception room. As the saying goes, "There is a great scholar when joking, but there is no Ding Bai when interacting". And it is this laughter that makes me "turn the thoughts of leaders into the wealth of the whole society." The pursuit has become a reality. As an editor-in-chief, how can you treat such a guest badly? Even if it is difficult, you should match your knowledge with the guests, and you can't let the guests lose their identity in this living room. In the past five years, the editor-in-chief has devoted himself to further studies in Peking University and other universities. Not only did he get a doctor's hat, but he was also hired as a researcher at Peking University Public Economic Management Research Center. For nothing else, just to lift the weight as easily as possible and resolve the dignified superposition of topics over the years. It may be a good choice to really let the dialogue return to nature. From listening to being listened to, from asking questions to interacting, it is really a liberation. Maybe I don't adapt at the moment, but under the premise of relief, the worst feeling is just "relaxed and happy"