Ji Xiaolan deliberately misspelled two words in the inscription of Confucius. Why can't anyone change it for hundreds of years?

This problem can actually be compared with the word "avoidance" when Emperor Kangxi inscribed the summer resort. First of all, like Emperor Kangxi, Ji Xiaolan has another meaning in "typo"; Second: Like Emperor Kangxi, Ji Xiaolan didn't write a typo at all, but this word is almost unknown. Since Ji Xiaolan didn't write typos, let alone hundreds of years, I'm afraid no one can change them for hundreds of years.

The inscription left by Ji Xiaolan is a pair of couplets: "Live with the country, be honored in the imperial court, and write the moral holy family together". This couplet shows great respect for the Confucius family: while praising the unparalleled wealth and honor of the Confucius family, it also praises the cultural background and first-class moral feelings of the Confucius family, which can be said to be the desire of the secular and saints. However, this couplet has two shortcomings: first, it is rich in characters and lacks a single point; Another place is the seal script at the lower part of the couplet, with Japanese in the middle, because the cross at the lower part extends upward, and finally the Tian Zi is formed.

As a great genius at that time, Ji Xiaolan had first-class literary talent and unparalleled talent. Theoretically, he won't make such a low-level mistake as spelling mistakes. And this couplet has been hung for more than 300 years. If it was a typo, it should have been replaced a long time ago. There are many specious statements about typos in couplets. For example, it is said that this article is Ji Xiaolan's blessing to Confucius. The word "rich" has no point, which means wealth has no apex, while the word "chapter" means infinite literary talent.

In fact, many Chinese characters, such as Hui, are written in many other ways. In the Qing Dynasty and Ji Xiaolan era, the word "fu" was undivided, and the chapter extended vertically into the Japanese characters, which was also one of the popular writing methods at that time. This does not mean that Ji Xiaolan wrote a typo, nor does it mean that Ji Xiaolan has other meanings.