(1) Guo Chuan and Xi have a high position in history.
First of all, the position of the national aim in history is much higher than that of the Preface to the Lanting Pavilion, so I think the value of the Preface to the Lanting Pavilion is far less than that of the national aim. Today, the national laws and the Preface to Lanting have disappeared. If they can reappear in the world, both items must be priceless, but if they must be compared, the national laws and regulations are more valuable. After all, the imperial edict is the ancient king. Sacred right? The symbol represents the supreme power of the king, which is not comparable to the order of Lanting.
(2) The history of transmitting the seal is much longer than that of Preface to Lanting.
Secondly, from the perspective of a long history, the inheritance of the imperial seal is far more valuable than the Preface to Lanting. Guo Chuan was founded in Xi in the Qin Dynasty, about 228 BC. This is the special seal for the king that Qin Shihuang asked Prime Minister Li Si to make. Preface to Lanting, written in Jin Dynasty, is a calligraphy work written by calligrapher Wang Xizhi in 353 AD. Therefore, from the time point of view, the history of the creation of the national seal is 58 1 year longer than the Preface to Lanting, which is one of the reasons why I think the national seal is more valuable.
(3) There is only one imperial seal, but Wang Xizhi's calligraphy has more than one Preface to Lanting.
Finally, from the perspective of rare things, it should also be that the value of national laws and regulations is higher. There is only one national seal in the world, which disappeared as early as the demise of the Northern Song Dynasty, and Wang Xizhi's calligraphy works are not just Preface to Lanting, so the national seal is even more rare.