Zhuge Liang is a great politician, while Guo Jia is a strategist. However, because Lao Luo used to deify Zhuge, we later learned that all the things we admired were false, and our love for Zhuge fell to the bottom. And the appearance of Guo Jia made us see hope. Cao Cao's sentence "Guo Fengxiao is here, don't make us lonely here" made us fantasize that if Guo Jia was still alive at that time, if ... too much, if we started to admire Guo Jia.
I am a loyal fan of Jia, and I like Guo Jia very much since I started reading The History of the Three Kingdoms. Not only because of his cleverness, but also because of his publicity and Cao Cao's kind of acquaintance. Whenever there is doubt, ask Guo Jia, and every dispute ends with "filial piety is the same as loneliness".
Although Guo Jia's life was short, he used countless tricks, all of which were bizarre and dangerous. When Cao Cao was in a dilemma, he strengthened his belief and wiped out Lu Bu in one fell swoop. The "virtual country expedition" attacked Wuwan, leaving Yuan's remaining party with no place to stand. It was his life that left us with the word "the soldiers are expensive and fast". On the other hand, Zhuge was a famous politician. He developed Shu and gave Liu Bei, who had nothing, three points of the world. However, when it comes to using strategy, he abandoned Luo Guanzhong's "burning hope", "borrowing arrows from straw boats", "borrowing the east wind" and even the "burning Red Cliff" with Zhou Yu as the protagonist. He made little special achievements in strategy. Prime Minister Zhuge, who was "cautious all his life and strict with himself", hardly fought a classic war example worthy of being recorded in history.
In the 12th year of Jian 'an (AD 27), Guo Jia died at the age of 38. In the same year, Liu Bei invited Zhuge Liang from Wolonggang. Guo Jia was a genius in strategy, and Zhuge was a genius in politics. We are deeply sorry that we failed to see these two rare geniuses fighting with each other.
Regarding these, I suggest that the landlord can often go to Zhuge Liang and Guo Jia in Baidu, where there are some. There is also an article "Born in Guo Fengxiao" written by Mr. Zhou Zexiong, which is a good article in this respect. I suggest the landlord read it /f? Kz=4582378
The common people mistakenly think that Sima Yi usurped Cao Wei, and if it is not a romance, it will be official, and loyalty and treachery are quite negotiable.
First of all, from the existing historical materials, there is no evidence that Sima Yi betrayed Cao Wei's royal family. Sima Yi treated Lord Wei and Empress Guo at home, and made a crusade against foreign martial arts, except that Gao Ping Ling was criticized for killing Cao Shuang. However, Cao Shuang is not equal to the royal family. Sima Yi and Cao Shuang are both ministers of Fuzheng, and they are minions of the Wei Lord. Sima Yi's removal of Cao Shuang is equivalent to Cao Shuang's exclusion of Sima Yi. If Sima Yi falsely accused Cao Shuang, the minister of Fuzheng at the same level, would it be possible for Cao Shuang to count Sima Yi, the minister of Fuzheng at the same level, as guilty and deceives you? Throughout Sima Yi's life, Cao Fang, the monarch, did not lose the great position of Wei, insisting that Sima Yi usurped Cao Wei, as if he had repeatedly said that Cao Cao usurped the Han Dynasty. In fact, it was all done by descendants, and Cao Cao and Sima Yi should not be blamed. In the end, Cao Pi usurped Han and Sima Yan usurped Wei.
Let's look at Sima Yi's life, which was originally the guardian of Cao Wei Empire.
militarily speaking, there were two invasions, namely, fighting against a century-old disaster in Northeast China, blocking Zhuge's Northern Expedition in Southwest China, and retreating from Soochow. Anne Youying captured Meng Da and pacified Wang Ling's rebellion (plus Wu Qiujian and Zhuge Dan collectively called Huainan Three Rebellions, and all three rebellions were pacified by Sima Jia, but that was later after Sima Shi).
In terms of internal affairs, the supply of supplies made the front line worry-free. Cao Pi also thought that Sima Yi, who was "the people in the town, provided military resources outside", had the Xiao He style of Liu Bang in those days. Compared with the tradition of Shu Han withdrawing from grain, one of the reasons for Cao Wei's military superiority was that logistics kept making constant contributions, which was the first to bear the brunt. Reclamation in Shangtuo and Huaibei; Tianshui, Jingzhao, Annan's iron smelting, irrigation national canal, water diversion wide channel, the construction of Jin slope and southeast slopes. As a result, thousands of hectares of fertile farmland have been irrigated, and the country has been enriched.
In terms of time, Cao Pi died at the age of forty, while Cao Rui only lived for thirty and four years. The sum of father and son is only seventy and four, just one year longer than Sima Yi. Sima Yiguang devoted himself to Cao Cao's parents for forty-one years from the 13th year of Jian 'an to the first year of Jiaping, and his achievements can be summed up as "going out into the phase". Life is 7 years old. If Sima Yi died at the age of 7, there would be no subsequent killing of Cao Shuang. Therefore, Sima Yi 'an's life is busy inside and outside, and I don't know how to evaluate it.
In terms of Cao Shuang's loyalty to Cao Fang, the ruler of Wei Dynasty, Cao Fang ascended the throne at a young age and originally lived with Empress Dowager Guo. Cao Shuang first moved the Empress Dowager back to Yongning Palace, separating Empress Dowager Guo from Cao Fang. On the one hand, he acted arbitrarily. Besides spreading his henchmen widely, he also changed the original system, which could not be banned by Wei, and Cao Shuang was more than successful. On the other hand, he accepted all the concubines, even spared Cao Rui's harem beauties, and used the exclusive technicians, bands and armed guards of the royal family. As a vassal, he used the king's restraint and overstepped his bounds, acting like an emperor. Although Cao Fang is not Cao Rui's own son, Cao Shuang not only occupies Cao Rui's talents, but also uses Cao Rui's teachers, advocates and forbids soldiers. Cao Rui was the statue of the emperor of Wei before his death, and Cao Shuang was the minister of Fuzheng, which is the real crime of deceiving you.
Sima Yi's crusade against Cao Shuang happened to be on the side of the Qing Dynasty, and he was devoted to Wei.
it's not modesty to pretend to refuse first and then accept it later. Although Cao Cao resigned from the Prime Minister three times, he later accepted to become the Han Dynasty. However, Sima Yi refused to accept the resignation of the Prime Minister, Jiu Xi and Jun Gong when he was alive. If he had ambitions, he would have accepted it gladly. Even the above table shows fear, in case people from all directions will comment on it as a minister. Sima Yi refused to accept his false words, gave up his high official position and wealth, and died all his life. Although Cao Cao didn't have to rely on him for his success, he had already arranged the environment well and left the opportunity to Cao Pi. However, Sima Yi never made a design for Cao Jia, and there were many rebellions in Wei later. It is still too early for Sima Jia to master Cao Wei's theory at the moment.
Conspiracy theorists often refer to it as "Zhuge in the south and Sima in the north", but in fact, it is not so much that the powerful ministers seized it as that the monarch lost people's hearts.
the reason why the monarch and the minister are ectopic is that the monarch is weak or the minister is strong, and there is no wind in the hole, and there are reasons for it.
Emperor Cao Wei, like Shaodi and Xian Di at the end of the Han Dynasty, had a very unstable national political situation, and his ministers were eyeing him, not just Sima. Emperor Xian of Han Dynasty was unable to resist the bullying of Dong Zhuo and Cao Cao, just as Cao Fang was unable to confront Cao Shuang and Sima Yi, but the tide was gone. Cao Fang was not as strong as Cao Cao and Cao Pi. The decline of imperial power is the reason why Sima Jia rose. It is better to say that the monarch is weak and defeated than the powerful minister. The decline of the central government and the rise of ministers have the opportunity, which is precisely the phenomenon that Qin lost its deer and the world was driven by it. Cao Wei's monarchical power declined, just like the decline of monarchical power in the Eastern Han Dynasty. It did not come from the rise of one of his subjects, such as He Jin, Dong Zhuo, Cao Cao, Yuan Shao and the Yellow turban insurrectionary. It was because of the central government's inability to control it that the localities left one after another. Cao Wei's monarch and minister are like history repeating itself.
Cao Shuang bullied the royal family first, but Sima Yi only fought back against Cao Shuang. For the Wei family, Sima Yi eradicated Cao Shuang's behavior and protected the throne for the sake of clearing the powerful ministers. Although Sima Yi's starting point is more for himself, it is undeniable that the removal of Cao Shuang is indeed beneficial for the emperor Cao Fang to be dominated by powerful ministers.
or Sima Yi was just trying to replace Cao Shuang by holding the emperor to make the vassal, but instead of guessing the possibility out of thin air, it is better to directly examine what actually happened. First of all, Cao Shuang has such powerful officials as "sealing the marquis to lead the city", "giving the sword to the temple", "refusing to enter the DPRK" and "praising and worshiping the unknown". Sima Yi refused to replace the royal family or Jiuxi, and even "firmly exempted the prime minister and the county magistrate". Secondly, Cao Shuang invaded the royal family and used royal personnel and ceremonies. Although there was no name of the emperor, there was an emperor, and Sima Yi respectfully regarded the minister as the monarch, and there was no infringement on the royal family. Whether it is hypocritical or intentional, in short, Sima Yi's behavior of guarding the emperor and Cao Shuang's bullying the emperor can be compared with each other, so we can examine the merits and demerits of the monarch and his subjects.
On the other hand, if Sima Yi fails in Gao Ping Ling, or if Sima Shi and Si Mazhao's descendants are corrupt, taking a comprehensive view of Sima Yi's life, he still has more merits than demerits. Just as the defection of Wu Qiujian and Zhuge Dan failed, although the one who succeeded or failed was Kou, there were still many good comments. In other words, if Sima Yi unfortunately failed, from the perspective of the loser, we still can't ignore his life achievements. But interestingly, Sima Yi succeeded in Gao Ping Ling, and so did his descendants. As a result, Sima Yi had a treacherous court official's evaluation, as if the successful criticism was worse than the failed praise.
if the crime is counted as usurpation, it is a bit arrogant. In fact, there was someone else who really started to usurp. Sima Yan was the one who usurped Wei, just as Cao Pi was the one who usurped Han, but the name of the treacherous court official was either attributed to Cao Cao or Sima Yi. If convicted of usurpation, there is still a Si Mazhao between Sima Yan and Sima Yi. It is too wrong for Sima Yi to be called a traitor. The object of Sima Yi's high Ping Ling Incident is the powerful minister who has the heart of trespass. As far as identity is concerned, Sima Yi and Cao Shuang are both ministers of Fuzheng, and the coup against each other is not considered as the following treacherous court official. Although the rendering of Romance of the Three Kingdoms caused negative comments, Sima Yi's notoriety began in Shile, Yongjia Rebellion, which destroyed Sima Zong Temple with personal hatred. In addition, the Jinshi family crossed the south, and the gentry closed the north and south, so the people blamed Sima Yi, the initiator. Later emperors, such as Emperor Taizong, did not encourage them to follow Sima Yi's example when they ordered the compilation of Jin books, so their evaluation was not high.
grievances have their heads, and debts have their owners: Sima Shi was the one who abolished the emperor, Si Mazhao was the one who killed the emperor, and Sima Yan was the one who usurped the throne. It is not Sima Yi's turn to talk about rape and evil. Unless according to the concept of monarch, monarch, minister and minister, since Wei is a matter, it will eventually be Wei Chen, and Sima Jia finally committed disrespect, and traced back to the source and spread to Sima Yi. Children and grandchildren are duty-bound to bring trouble to their ancestors, which also makes Sima Yi die unsatisfied.
how severe the evaluation of later generations is, just as there is a long way to go, trembling with fear, walking on thin ice, "there is a reputation for being safe, and there is a ruin for perfection."
There are good things and bad things, and whether the fines should be fair or not, regardless of the fans of the authorities, can be carefully considered.
In Sima Yi's life, although there was the Gao Ping Ling Incident in his later years, his early contributions can be carefully scrutinized. Although the crime of murder must be condemned, but whether the praise of Du Ji's construction is modern or not, must we be stingy? Although Sima Yi has made mistakes, there are also many things that are right. Besides criticizing his mistakes, can he also treat the benefits with the same mentality and give some applause? This is the original sigh for the article.
It is meaningless to argue who is better than who. In fact, it is impossible to have an answer. Today, people may not know better than the parties whether Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi have cracked their strategies or tactics. As for accident and necessity, I won't mention them any more, because things that are logically clear don't need to be a dictionary. As far as "Zhuge Liang never defeated Sima Yi in his life" is concerned, this is just a statement of fact, and from another angle, "Sima Yi never defeated Zhuge Liang in his life", and the fact is equally true. Therefore, this does not mean who has strong ability and who has weak ability to suppress. If you want to talk about the definition of defeat and the achievement of the purpose of war, it seems redundant and not life-threatening. Inferring ability evaluation by factual statements is just like "Wei Yan never defeated Xiahou Mao in his life", which is a mockery of the original "Xiahou Mao was a hero of the Three Kingdoms who Wei Yan couldn't win". The facts spoken are correct, but there are some unspoken fallacies.
There is no difference between black and white because of different positions, otherwise it is prejudice and limitation. If we talk about Sima Yi from Cao Shuang's standpoint, of course, we criticize evil fraud; On the other hand, if you stand in Sima Yi's position, it seems that it is a last resort to protect yourself. Therefore, if Cao Shuang is attached, it is not Sima Yi, and Sima Yi is not Cao Shuang. Is it different for each person? Of course, this is negative, and there will be different judgments due to different positions, and they will still fall into the confusing situation of the authorities. Killing people out of their homes will not become justified because of the necessity of the situation; Didn't the victim who was killed really deserve to die when he was innocent?
No matter from the standpoint of the murderer or the deceased, after all, the murderer is blamed for the murder, and the victim is the deceased: no matter how beautiful the murderer is, it is impossible to hide the crime; Degrade the dead, still can't get rid of the murderer; Even if you praise the dead, you can't ignore the fact of being victimized; Even if the murderer is vilified, he will not change into the hands of a dead murderer. Therefore, no matter how changeable the position is, facts and evaluations should still be black and white.
The High Ping Ling Incident is a stain on Sima Yi, but I wonder how many people looked at Sima Yi before he was 71. We will not criticize the whole tree for being bad because one leaf is ugly, and we will not say that the whole forest is ruined. There is more than one tree in the forest, and there are hundreds of leaves in a tree. Although a mouse excrement can spoil a pot of porridge, it doesn't mean that the whole pot of porridge is equally bad. Who knows that the whole pot of porridge before pollution is not excellent and crystal clear?
to cover the whole with one side loses the whole picture. Although there are advantages and disadvantages, why not praise the advantages and criticize the disadvantages? At present, it is popular to smear all the advantages with a little stain, or to cover up the stains with beautification and bleaching, but it becomes a hidden evil to promote the good or to praise the ugly without saying anything, and losing its black should be its dark and bright.
Sima Yi was certainly a pioneer of Jin Dynasty, but he was also a guardian of Cao Wei. Whether it is fair to punish or not, there are good and bad things. Although there are some bad things such as seizing power and spurning, why not applaud him for guarding Cao Wei?
Sima Yi-A Brief Historical Biography
Sima Yi was born in a noble family, and worked as a petty official in the county in his early years, and was later turned into a literary official by Cao Cao. Cao Cao called Queen Wei, Sima Yi was the illegitimate son of the prince, assisted Cao Pi, and listed as "four friends" with Chen Qun, who was the main figure of Cao Pi's think tank. After Cao Pi replaced the Han Dynasty, Sima Yi rose steadily and began to grasp the power. After Cao Rui succeeded to the throne, Sima Yi sat in Wancheng, supervised the military affairs of Jingyu and Yuzhou, presided over Jingzhou's attack on Wu, and succeeded Cao Zhen in defending Shu, successfully defending Zhuge Liang's northern expedition several times. After Cao Fang succeeded to the throne, Sima Yi and Cao Shuang * * * supported the government. Sima Yi was excluded by Cao Shuang, and later staged a coup to kill the Cao Shuang clan, and since then he has mastered the power of Wei. After Sima Yi's death, the regime of Wei was still controlled by his son, which led to the occurrence of Wei in Jin Dynasty many years later. Sima Yi was posthumously named Emperor of Jin Dynasty.
Sima Yi-A Brief Biography of Romance
Sima Yi was a literary adviser in his early years and later a master book. He was one of Cao Cao's advisers, but he was not famous. Later, Sima Yi helped Cao Pi to take the place of Han Dynasty, made plans to cut Shu in five ways, and began to emerge. Before Cao Pi died of illness, he became a minister of life care. After Cao Rui ascended the throne, Sima Yi volunteered to defend the western part of Wei. Later, due to Ma Su's double agent scheme, it was once abandoned. However, in the face of Zhuge Liang's northern expedition, Wei had to use Sima Yi again. Sima Yi was defeated by Zhuge Liang many times, so he adopted the strategy of closing the door without fighting until Zhuge Liang died of illness. After Cao Fang succeeded to the throne, Sima Yi and Cao Shuang * * * supported the government. Sima Yi was excluded by Cao Shuang, so he launched a coup to kill the Cao Shuang clan, and since then he has mastered the power of Wei. After Sima Yi's death, the regime of Wei was still controlled by his son, which led to the occurrence of Wei in Jin Dynasty many years later. Sima Yi was posthumously named Emperor of Jin Dynasty.
Jia Xu-Personal file
Personal data Gender male
Native place [Liangzhou] Wuwei Guzang [now Wuwei, Gansu]
There is no relevant record about his appearance
Official to Qiu.