Legal analysis: At present, there are different ways to judge whether the notice of ordering correction can be brought to the local court. The main criterion is that the act is a procedural act, which obviously has no practical impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, so that it cannot be prosecuted. On the other hand, the above standards are too simple and broad, which leads to a "one size fits all" situation of not accepting or excluding all, ignoring the practical complexity of forced demolition. The notice ordered to make corrections defines the behavior of the counterpart, and the subsequent trend of the notice is the established compulsory demolition decision and compulsory demolition behavior, as well as the notification behavior that the final behavior cannot be absorbed and covered. It should be considered as an actionable administrative act, and the court should conduct judicial review according to the different stages of the development of the administrative act of compulsory demolition.
The notice of ordering correction generally appears in the process of compulsory demolition of illegal buildings and structures by administrative organs, in order to order the relative person to dismantle illegal buildings by himself within a certain period of time or before a certain time node. At present, there are still differences on whether the notice belongs to the scope of administrative litigation.
Legal basis: Article 23 of the Administrative Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China. When implementing administrative punishment, the administrative organ shall order the parties to correct the illegal act or make corrections within a time limit.