After a year and two months of suffering, the families of the deceased on both sides finally waited for the court to pronounce the sentence, but the result was not comfort, but dissatisfaction and disappointment after suffering.
The accident generally happened as follows: Defendant Hu Mouying was driving a * * car and collided head-on with pedestrian Zhao Rongrong due to improper operation. The victim Li Jian died on the spot, and the victim Zhao Rongrong died after being rescued.
After the court's judgment, the defendant Hu Mouying committed a traffic accident and was sentenced to four years in prison. What is the basis of judgment? The driver takes full responsibility. According to the relevant laws and regulations, whoever commits the crime of causing traffic accidents and takes full or main responsibility for the accident, resulting in the death of 1 person or serious injuries to more than three people, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention.
It was mentioned in the judgment that the defendant Hu Mouying truthfully confessed his crime after arriving at the case and pleaded guilty in court. His family compensated part of the economic losses of his victim's family, so he was given a lighter punishment as appropriate. For this statement, the families of the victims Li Jian and Zhao Rongrong disagreed.
1, the victim Hu Mouying didn't do it? Confess truthfully? . For example, when Hu Mouying confessed, he said that the speed at that time was about 30-40 yards. According to the judicial appraisal of the case, Hu Mouying's speed at the time of the accident was 7 1.9 yards, and Hu was already seriously speeding. Speeding on city streets is another illegal act.
2. The victim's safety awareness is weak. The victim's lawyer said that Hu had an illegal overtaking behavior and had 200-degree myopia, but he did not wear glasses and drove with one hand after only four months of obtaining a driver's license. The author thinks that although it is not intentional homicide, it should also be accidental homicide.
3. The families of the perpetrators have their own ways in economic compensation.
The victim's family said that the perpetrator Hu Mouying's family never offered to pay related expenses, such as medical expenses and funeral expenses. It was under the repeated communication of the traffic police that each family gave a funeral fee of 24,000 yuan, which was paid twice after repeated urging. During Zhao Rongrong's rescue, the medical expenses were paid by the family members themselves, and the medical expenses of more than 70,000 yuan were paid after repeated reminders and consultations.
If the above situation is true, it is a sign of covering up the crime, disrespecting the dead, avoiding the important and neglecting the important, and having no remorse for the crime. Can this behavior be forgiven? Can't reduce the sentence, but also aggravate the crime.
In fact, in the traffic accident crime, the offender can make up for the victim's family by giving financial compensation in addition to being sentenced, and the law also has corresponding financial compensation standards. For example, funeral expenses are calculated according to the average monthly salary of employees in the place where the court is located for six months. Zhao Rongrong and Li Jian are both teachers of Xiamen University. According to their salary, tens of thousands of dollars can't meet the compensation standard. In addition, there is compensation for mental damage, a two-family family that lost its independence. In addition, plus the cost of training two master students, can you have tens of thousands of dollars? Hundreds of thousands is not much.
Therefore, in addition to sentencing Hu to four years in prison, the court should also sentence the perpetrators to pay more economic compensation to these two families who lost their independence.
After we have made clear the responsibility that the perpetrator should bear, we will answer the main question back and forth. The reason why the platform has to bear the responsibility is because the platform that provides * * * cars has not obtained the license of leasing business, which can be said to be illegal operation. After the accident, the company was fined 30 thousand yuan by law enforcement departments, which also reached the upper limit of such fines in the industry.
This shows that the platform is responsible for the accident at this time, and the economic penalty of 30,000 yuan is far lower than that of the perpetrators.
After hearing the court's decision, Li Jian's parents wept bitterly. ? Over the past year, we have never received any comfort or apology from the client, not even a text message or a phone call. ? The victim told the reporter in disappointment. On the same day, many family members of Hu Mouying appeared in court, but no one came to say hello and said a word of comfort.
How can this give him a light sentence? We refuse to accept it. ? This is what the victim said the most. Perhaps it is dissatisfaction with the indifference of the families of the perpetrators. After all, no amount of compensation can save the lives of two young children, nor can it make up for the hard work of four old people in raising children for more than 20 years. Only endless thoughts accompany these four old people who lost their independence for the rest of their lives.
(The picture is from the Internet, and the infringement must be deleted)