Does art have anything to do with money? Is the three views related to money? )

Thank you for inviting me!

Any kind of work can be called a work of art, so it naturally has social and economic value. The higher the artistry, the higher the economic value.

Take China painter Zhou Chunya as an example. His 222 paintings are among the most expensive works of art in the world at a price of 470 million yuan. His painting "Red Rock" was sold at the price of12.56 million RMB, which realized the economic value of art.

Art is to add elegance to people's lives. Improve mental health. Moral artist. Always want to add fun to social people. Therefore, we can create far-reaching works of art. Because morality is the foundation of everything. Money is a necessity for artists. If it matters, that's the point.

Yes But it is important to handle this relationship well. Mei Lanfang and Chang Xiangyu are both great artists. They all live by art, support their families, develop their careers and accumulate wealth. But they are also models of patriotism. No matter how rich Mei Lanfang is in Japan, Mr. Mei will not perform for them. During the War to Resist U.S. Aggression and Aid Korea, Mr. Chang Xiangyu donated a plane to our country, which set off the climax of people's donations to resist U.S. aggression and aid Korea. Art, in the final analysis, is also a job, and it is natural and understandable to benefit from it. However, if art is completely above money and art becomes a means of worshipping money, there will be problems. Small will make their artistic life drift from place to place. Generally speaking, it will bring ecological pollution to society. Correcting the relationship between art and money has become a very important social problem at present, which should be highly valued by the art world.

thank you It varies from person to person. Some people earn money by art, while others pursue artistic enjoyment without considering money. involve

Art has little to do with money. Cao Xueqin scribbled a dream of red mansions, Su Shi and Liu Zongyuan relegated to writing famous sentences through the ages, Sima Qian went to prison to write historical records, Du Fu watched his youngest son starve to death, and wrote that the wine in Zhumen stinks the road and freezes the bones; The more in adversity and poverty, the deeper people look at things, the better they can write works.

Agree with the above students. Art and money are not necessarily related. But it's all important in the end. Art is associated with money. Lost the value of art? But in the end, all art will return to its value. But people's art today has its value. There is nothing we can do about it. In today's society, whoever is lofty will starve, live in a small house and ride a car. Throughout the ages, all works of art. They were all painted with precious chrome [covering their faces].

Thank you for inviting me to climb up the 22nd floor. We have our own opinions, rational, extreme, gentle, and so on.

Art and money are philosophical issues. Can't be parallel, one is ceramic tile and the other is tall building.

There have been many philosophies about mediocrity and art:

What is expensive is not necessarily a good painting, but a good painting is definitely expensive.

I spent half a century in prose, poetry, novels, prose, oil painting, gouache, Chinese painting, calligraphy, music, drama and dance. Many people have become insiders, but I am still naive.

So, your question is a cliche.

Let me answer you directly:

Art is closely related to the money it depends on, but art is more closely related to the hardships of generating ideas.

Let's start with Van Gogh. A depressed person who loves painting and is poor. There is no art without depression. Being an artist should be depressed, being an official should be sober and being a philosopher should be wise.

Van Gogh needed passion to paint. Fortunately, his business brother gave him money. He scrimped and saved most of his money and raised several beautiful little girls until they grew up and got married. He likes beautiful women dangling in front of him, so he has created many good works full of passion.

I think that if Van Gogh's paintings are sold, his epilepsy will be treated soon, and he will live a rich life and create more works.

However, when artists are alive, works of art are often worthless. What is valuable is those fake masters of art, and it is funny to ratify them afterwards. Van Gogh lived a cowardly life and died a glorious one. Fortunately, he lives in his own unique world and may be happier than us. Because in the eyes of painters, there are only beautiful women and fine arts, and there is no political and economic anxiety. Like Hemingway, even suicide is so beautiful.

Van Gogh lived to be 37 years old, suffered from epilepsy and shot himself. That gun? Ring, leaving a priceless sunflower? .

Europeans are not worried about this artist's lewdness. After all, he created eternal beauty with his life.

Van Gogh's self-portrait

Artists need tolerance, understanding, money, as well as conditioned reflex, eager for better occurrence in suffering and creating masterpieces of the times.

Without sadness, there would be no literature and art.

Without economic support, there would be no literature and art.

Without the Song and Ming Rebellion, without the well-off families of Jin Shengtan, Luo Guanzhong, Shi Naian and Cao Xueqin, there would be no "Four Great Classical Novels".

Dear readers and authors of today's headlines, your earnest answer to this epoch-making question is itself a masterpiece of social science.

20 10 I went to the Louvre in Paris to attend an art exhibition. I was very moved to see the old lady send hot steamed buns to the painter who sketched in the snow. French art is developed in an atmosphere of respecting the nation. Our artistic creation is always embarrassing when we are short of money. The painter had to lower his noble head and become a capitalist.

In addition to impetuousness and meditation, modern people want to get tired of the smell of copper and squeeze in. Being a man is difficult. Me too. A calligraphy was auctioned online the day before yesterday, 18000. I bought it and took 57,000 the next day before I was willing to drop the hammer. For money, I am not short of money. Humans use gold and silver to discuss art and occupy the market. Real art cannot be retreated when the enemy advances.

Price is the embodiment of value.

People compete for fame and fortune, titles, backgrounds and teachers. I have no background, so I can only spell the price. Is there something wrong?

The original work of "Mountain Chrysanthemum Blossoms"

I didn't put down the ink bamboo until 150000. Why do people walk the red carpet for hundreds of thousands?

People fight for fresh meat, face value and belly. What are we arguing about calligraphy and painting? Can only spell pen and ink on paper.

"Village Port" created the day before yesterday.

People, including artists, are surrounded by power, money, cars, houses and beautiful women. Everyone is talking about money, keep your eyes open. You ask artists to close their eyes and pretend not to see it, treating money like dirt?

Life, quality of life is the ultimate goal. Everything else is an excuse. Don't talk big with me. You have no money. Just try it.

Now the information circulation is so developed that there are no very good works and artists are poor.

I painted and wrote articles for money. My family was so poor that I ate grass roots and bark naked and almost died. For the development of national culture and art, it was full later.

When life has worked hard, experienced the covet of power economy, disaster has gone to soup and fire, survived, retired and returned home, I really saw the sun, all his glory.

Now, walking in the winding path of the gravel road in the back garden every morning will also remind me of people who are still fighting. Do they fight for art or money?

This morning's shoot.

What is easy to satisfy with money is wealth.

Art is never satisfied.

Anyway,

Just be happy.

Art must be related to money! How can you learn art and engage in art without money? Learning art must be supported by money. How can I buy study materials without money? It is a law to change the artistic achievements after study into money, and then create and sell them. Art must be related to money, such as exhibitions of painters and painters, literary publications published by writers, performances by musicians and dancers, and so on. These all need money, except charity, which is actually related to money. At the charity ceremony, the organizer will tell you that XXX donated something worth N yuan for this activity. Art itself must be valuable, and this value is reflected by money, but in different ways. Even the headlines gave some money as a reward for the author's creation. What's more, a work of art? People often say that "money is not everything, but without money, you can't do anything." For reference only.

This is very important. It's for living. It doesn't matter whether you don't want to or not, it's all for the purity and elegance of art. But I think elegance and vulgarity are always interdependent, and so is the relationship between art and money.

Say a few names first, Qi Baishi, Pan Tianshou, Xu Beihong, Zhang Daqian, Li Kuchan and so on! What about their works? Is it a work of art? ! In that case, let's see if these artists have anything to do with money. Not to mention Qi Baishi and Zhang Daqian! Two century-old masters make a living by selling paintings. Do you think art has something to do with money? Pan Tianshou, Xu Beihong and Li Kuchan don't just sell paintings for a living. You should know that Pan Tianshou Xu Beihong and Li Kuchan are all deans or professors of the Academy of Fine Arts! It's ok to sell some paintings while people are paying. Do you think art has something to do with money? Well, since it's all about money, then the works of these masters are no longer works of art? So they're not artists anymore?

Art is about money! Artists and painters are all human beings, and they all have to shit and pee. The so-called "it doesn't matter" means that a person can't be full of money if he wants to achieve something in art.

Engaging in art is for ideals and realizing one's own value; And money is for survival, in order to complete the tasks that a person undertakes in this life. There's nothing wrong with that. It is human nature that morality comes before dreams. We are all ordinary people, how can we suit both tastes?

Don't! Don't! Not at all!