Mistakes in quoting laws in judgments.

Legal subjectivity:

It depends on the specific situation. If the full text of the judgment only involves textual errors in the type of work, it can be corrected. If the entity is involved, such as changing the type of work, which may cause changes in the amount of judgment, etc., it is necessary to conduct a retrial in accordance with the appeal or trial supervision procedures. Article 170 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * After hearing an appeal case, the people's court of second instance shall handle it separately according to the following circumstances: (3) If the basic facts in the original judgment are unclear, it shall make a ruling to revoke the original judgment and send it back to the people's court that originally tried it for retrial, or revise the judgment after finding out the facts.

Legal objectivity:

Article 205 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), if the presidents of the people's courts at all levels find that there are errors in the legally effective judgments, rulings and conciliation statements, and think that a retrial is necessary, they shall submit them to the judicial committee for discussion and decision. The Supreme People's Court has the right to send back the legally effective judgments, rulings and conciliation statements of local people's courts at all levels and people's courts at higher levels or order the people's courts at lower levels to try them again if errors are found.