Analysis Report of Lanting Prose Collection 2000 words

Case 1: Case B in civil law is a minor whose parents are both dead. The villagers' committee to which B belongs appointed his brother A as the guardian of B, and informed A, who did not agree or deny it. Ten days after A was told to be a guardian, B got into a fight with a neighbor's child and lost 400 yuan. The parents of the neighbor's children filed a lawsuit, demanding that B compensate for the loss. The court informed A to appear in court, and A refused to appear in court. Meanwhile, the court refused to accept the appointment of the village committee. After hearing the case, the court decided to revoke the appointment of the original village Committee and appointed B's sister Ding as the guardian. Therefore, there are different opinions on who should bear the liability for compensation. Ding is not responsible for this incident. When Party A appointed Party B as the guardian, although it did not agree to the appointment, it also filed a lawsuit, and Party A should be responsible for this matter. B's grandparents should not take responsibility. Please make a case analysis report for the above cases (including a brief description of the case, pointing out the focus of the case dispute and its legal application, and analyzing it from the perspective of legal theory involved in the case). Case 2: In the criminal case, the defendant Li rented the first floor of No.53 Park Mountain Road, Tonglu County Street, and the victim Dong rented the room opposite the defendant Li rented. At 9 o'clock in the morning of August 3, 2004, the defendant Li saw the key inserted in the door of the victim Dong, and immediately had evil thoughts and opened the door with a knife and entered the rented room of the victim Dong. Defendant Li held Dong with a knife and asked him to hand over cash. The victim Dong took out the cash 100 yuan from the bag in the desk drawer and gave it to the defendant Li. Defendant Li suspected that he was short of money and threw 65,438,000 yuan in cash back into the drawer. At the same time, he proposed to have sex with the victim Dong, which was rejected and strongly resisted. During this period, the defendant Li bit the victim Dong's upper limb (minor skin injury). After the victim Dong falsely promised to have sex with the defendant Li in the rented house in the afternoon, the defendant Li stopped the violence. Defendant Li returned to his rented house, showed 500 yuan cash to victim Dong, and asked him to return to his rented house without calling the police. The victim Dong saw the defendant Li return to his room and called the police "1 10", and the defendant Li was arrested and brought to justice. Please make a case analysis report for the above cases (including a brief description of the case, pointing out the focus of the case dispute and its legal application, and analyzing it from the perspective of legal theory involved in the case). Case 3: The civil procedure law case and Du Mou are husband and wife. They live in the family building of the wireless power plant in Chengguan District of A city, but there are 6 houses in the suburb of their hometown B, where their eldest son Li Ming lives. 1996 Li Chun and his wife died in a car accident. Li Mei, the eldest daughter of the old man, is married and lives in Jiacheng. Li Ke, the second son of the old man (17 years old), 1998 was admitted to a university in B city. Because the university is close to Li Ming's residence, Li Ke asked Li Ming's wife, Zhang Li, to vacate one of her parents' vacant rooms for herself. Zhang Li said, "Li Ming was sentenced to five years' imprisonment for his crime. He is not at home and can't make his own decisions; And four rooms have been leased to Fang and Liu, and the lease period has not expired. " To this end, Li can sue to the court and demand the division of his parents' inheritance. After a court accepted the case, it was found in the trial that besides Li Minghe Li Ke, there were two heirs, the eldest daughter Li Mei and the second daughter Li Na. After being told by the court, Li Mei made it clear that she gave up her inheritance right and did not participate in the lawsuit; Li Na neither explicitly abstained nor participated in the lawsuit. After the first hearing of the court, the outsider found the court somewhere, claiming that the six rooms that Li Ming and his wife now live in were purchased at 1948 with the funds of the deceased Li Chun, and they owned half of the property rights, and submitted the deed of house signed by them at the time of purchase. Please make a case analysis report on the above case (including a brief description of the case, pointing out the focus of the case and its legal application, and analyzing the parties to the case from the theoretical perspective of civil procedure law).