Referring to "loser" as "weak" here is obviously a matter of understanding! Therefore it is completely wrong!
The "loser" in any competition or struggle cannot be crowned as the "weak"! Losers on the football field are not necessarily "weak", because this "defeat" and the other "win" are common things, what kind of "sympathy" is needed to not sympathize! There is no need to sympathize with the victory or defeat of a political struggle. The winner is king and the loser is the enemy of course!
Sorry for the question, I have to tell you that this question is somewhat unrealistic. Because not everyone sympathizes with the weak. Everything you mentioned should include the strong, the weak, and those in between. So it can only be said that some people sympathize with the weak.
Most of the so-called weak today are probably workers and peasants living at the lowest level. If it’s not the workers and peasants, is it still the rich who got rich first and the so-called intellectual elite?
In the entire society, except for a few people with status and money who are strong, there are also a considerable number of people who should be weak. Not all strong people sympathize with the weak, nor do all strong people look down on the weak. Some strong people also sympathize with the weak. We must always look at things dialectically in two parts, and we cannot summarize this social phenomenon absolutely or uniformly.
We hope that all strong people should treat the problems of the weak correctly, and not just verbally sympathize with the weak and be a verbal sympathizer. When the strong become rich and strong, they should follow Comrade Deng Xiaoping's suggestion and use practical actions to implement the guiding spirit of getting rich first and then getting rich later, so that the weak can follow you and become rich step by step and change from weak to weak. This is The right attitude for all the rich and powerful. The kind of behavior that looks down upon, even hates, and bullies the weak from the bottom of one's heart is completely wrong, unkind, and even reactionary. Because the weak basically belong to the broad masses of workers and peasants! < /p>
Being bullied for good will be best expressed in childhood and adolescence, which is the most naked expression of the nature of human beings to bully the weak and fear the strong. We have all experienced it. In elementary school and junior high school, the person who did not study well and was timid and afraid of getting into trouble was ignored by the teacher. , children with no background in the family are most likely to be bullied... And even good students who are kind and do not bully others will smile with contempt in their hearts when they hear about such and such poor students...
As adults, we We all live with masks, try our best to curb our nature, and treat them politely, but we will still be controlled by the instinct of worshiping the strong and devaluing the weak. For example, when humans choose leaders, they will try their best to choose leaders who are better than themselves in all aspects. Strong people, otherwise they will be dissatisfied in their hearts... Under the halo of university professors, we feel dirty, which is caused by our strong nature...
In love, women just can't be attracted to men with honest personalities. The feeling of liking, even though I know she is a good person in my heart, in the long evolution, women prefer strong men to protect themselves... And the kind of scumbag who yells at women will make women feel that the man is very powerful...
This kind of thinking of worshiping the strong is deeply ingrained in human beings and even affects objective judgment. The same calligraphy work, if one is signed by a country peasant woman and another is signed by a university art professor, will be evaluated and sold at a price They are all very different...
Mencius said that a person without compassion is not a human being, so when King Qi saw the cattle being killed, he felt heartbroken, and the gentleman stayed away from the kitchen because he couldn't bear it... < /p>
Humans, social animals, believe in social attributes and must have the ability to understand and sympathize with others at all costs. This is conducive to the survival of the team. This kind of self-interest and altruism is not only found in humans, but also in social animals. The nature of...
But for the weak, although they sympathize with them, they often have various shortcomings: "The so-called pitiful people must be hateful." For example, if you sympathize with a poor person and give him Donate money in the hope that he can improve his life, but he just buys wine and drinks. What should you do? Although you are a kind-hearted and good person, will you think highly of such a person? I can only lament his misfortune and be angry that he will not fight...