1, many things fail not because there is no plan, but because there is a lack of action before planning! (Understand the basic situation)
"Failure is the mother of success" is for those who have the quality of success. For those who do not have the quality of success, failure again is a repeat of the tragedy! (Learn a lesson and get to the point)
Important note: the judicial examination in 2009 is the same as that in 2008! ! !
"highlighting the three laws and three complaints"; "Highlight key points, broaden and deepen"; "Highlight practice".
First of all, lift the veil of the proposer-adjust the line of sight.
Criminal Law: Chen Zexian, Zhou Guangquan.
Criminal proceedings: Wang He and Song Dynasty
Civil law: Wen Shiyang
Commercial Law: Wang Weiguo
Civil complaint: Pan Jianfeng
Law: high talent
Articles of Association: Han Dayuan and Liu Maolin.
State Private: Qin Huang.
Lord protector: Qin.
National classic: Zhang.
Legal history: Zhao Xiaogeng
Second, reveal the proposition law of "three laws and three lawsuits"-clear goals.
1, guiding ideology of civil law cases: ordinary life, difficult jurisprudence.
This kind of topic continues to increase this year, which is the fundamental reason for the low score of civil law. The intuitive feeling of this kind of problem is "at first glance, it is basically wrong."
2. Guiding ideology of criminal law cases: common and frequent, difficult and complicated.
In 2008, I got 23 points on the six charges of robbery, fraud, theft, embezzlement and corruption, which verified the guiding ideology of this proposition. This kind of topic continues to increase this year, which is the fundamental reason for the low score of criminal law. The intuitive feeling of this kind of questions is that "reciting the law is not enough."
3. Propositional characteristics of administrative law and administrative procedure law: return to law and strengthen operation. Strengthen the study of laws and regulations and you can score smoothly.
Third, break the shackles of college students passing the department exam-four months to pass the department exam.
1. Three disadvantages of current university education compared with judicial examination:
(1) Pay more attention to ideas than rules: legal research traces its roots and explores its value, and all the research directions and contents of teachers are reflected in teaching. The classroom has become an auditorium for teachers to promote academics: a hundred schools of thought contend and hold their own opinions. Our textbooks are different.
(2) Pay more attention to literary theory than practice: our school teaching is purely book-based, with few examples and no practice. The key to our teaching achievement, achievement and degree depends on the thesis, which can be described as "one writing is for life". Most of our teachers have no experience in judicial practice, let alone experience. Teaching is air-to-air, ideal versus imagination. Theory is seriously out of touch with practice. Knowledge is not equal to ability.
(3) Emphasis on discipline, light on system: Our teachers are basically elites in this discipline. What to learn and what to teach; What you teach is what you are; What it is, what it is. There is basically no cross-disciplinary and cross-departmental teaching. Knowledge is fragmented and there are serious barriers to each other. Practice is rich and colorful, and it is an interdisciplinary application process of law.
2. The way to pass the exam in four months.
The number of words in any counseling book is about 5 million words (about 3 million words in counseling books, about 0.5 million words in the compilation of laws and regulations, and about 500,000 words in real questions over the years). According to the requirements of the syllabus, 17000 test sites. Ok, let's calculate an account: it takes 50 days to read 65438+ million words every day, which is the ideal state. Reality is impossible. People with good knowledge reserves can read about 60 thousand words every day. It will take 100 days to finish reading this book in this way. Reading books once every three months, this test may be difficult. Therefore, most students had better prepare for the exam for about 7 months. As far as the characteristics of the current proposition are concerned, Sike is an illegitimate student who doesn't want some people to be admitted, especially "becoming a monk halfway"! So we are required to have a long-term psychological preparation. Gone are the days when you can pass the exam in one go!
The application of (1) real questions
The topics of judicial examinations over the years are the crystallization of the wisdom of the proposer (also the authority of the law), and its importance is self-evident. Studying the real questions over the years can help us understand the research, inspire our thinking and strengthen the key points.
"Details decide fate" has become the law of judicial examination. Summarizing the comparison and connection of detailed knowledge points is the biggest feature of this set of books. It can be described as "a book in hand, nothing else"!
Outward bound training can broaden knowledge, broaden thinking angle and strengthen key knowledge and memory. Judicial examination is also a knowledge dimension, and multi-angle thinking is also the embodiment of ability. The reason why candidates lose points is often not the lack of knowledge, but the lack of thinking angle. Outward bound training can help you overcome the stubborn disease of law, that is, "you can understand it at first sight, once you learn it, once you throw it away, you will forget it, once you use it, you will not understand it".
By analyzing item by item, we can deepen our understanding and find the test eye (trap, question bend). Eye test is the expression of test methods and proposition skills in test centers. The test sites are often the same, and the test eyes are changing. I only know the test center, but I don't know the eye test. It's terrible: "Every year is different."
(2) the use of the compilation of laws and regulations
80% of the scores are in law! ! Judicial examination is a comprehensive examination. It can be said that the important reason for candidates' failure is incomplete knowledge-the embankment of a thousand miles, which collapsed in the ant nest. The comprehensiveness of knowledge is like a barrel, and the amount of water in the barrel depends on the shortest board. Whether you pass or not depends entirely on the subjects that candidates have the most advantages.
(3) the choice of counseling books:
Review the first book: it is best to use the first book of the third book of Law Society.
The rest of the books are published by Compass.
(4) The indispensability of remedial classes: a compass in the vast sea!
The setting of remedial classes is self-contained and relatively independent. According to the requirements of examination practice, the design is based on the idea of step by step and gradual improvement. Resolutely put an end to the phenomenon of "low-level redundant construction". Compass school has scientifically set four levels of shifts:
(1) rectification theory course.
The "criminal object" in criminal law is an important content of traditional theory, but it has never been investigated because it is not the content of Sikh theory. Another example is the "causality" in criminal law, which is judged by inevitable causality and accidental causality in traditional theory. However, the real questions in the exam require judging by conditional theory and considerable causality (see question 4 1 in volume 2 of 2003, question 2 in volume 2 of 2006, question 1 in volume 2 of 2007 and question 52 in volume 2 of 2008). For another example, for theft, the traditional theory requires secrecy, while the Sikh theory holds that it can be stolen openly (see question 47 of Volume II in 2003 and question 17 of Volume II in 2006). For robbery, the traditional theory requires "taking advantage of people unprepared", but the theory of Seck does not require this (see question 60, Volume 2, 2006). The root of all these differences is that the traditional theory draws lessons from the theory of the former Soviet Union, while the author's theory draws lessons from the theory of Germany and Japan. Therefore, mastering the correct direction of examination theory is the premise of winning.
The indication of this change: 1, without systematic legal education.
2, after legal education but weak foundation.
3. After basic law education, the theory learned is not the theory advocated by the proposition teacher.
(2) Intensive classes
(3) Comprehensive promotion class
(4) Punching class for model test
(5) Introduction of compass series:
It is the constant pursuit of compass people to be the "most practical and convenient" reference book in the "Compilation of Necessary Laws and Regulations for Judicial Examination in 2009". The rules and explanations of this book are closely combined, which is easy to understand and helpful to remember; Analyze and summarize the key knowledge from the perspective of proposition, and improve the comprehensive ability of candidates; A small exam activates knowledge and trains candidates' ability to take exams.
The history of Detailed Classification of Judicial Examination Questions in 2009 is a mirror. Only by studying history can we grasp the present and predict the future. Facts have proved time and time again that studying the examination questions over the years is a shortcut to pass the judicial examination. To this end, the Compass Judicial Examination Research Center carefully organizes the book "Detailed Explanation of Examination Questions over the Years", striving for authoritative and accurate answers, comprehensive and meticulous analysis, and well-founded in the law, so that candidates can not only know what it is, but also know why.
The series "Case Teaching of Judicial Examination in 2009" teaches you how to analyze the legal relationship step by step through a series of "one sentence" small cases to meet the needs of "subjective and objective questions" in judicial examination. The cases listed in each discipline reflect the legal thinking mode, laws and characteristics of case analysis in this discipline. The case description is simple and clear, the law and legal analysis are concise and to the point, and the answer analysis accurately grasps the academic tendency of the proposer.
"2009 judicial examination strategy?" In today's criminal law circles, these two theories are intertwined. First of all, the traditional theory from the former Soviet Union is out of date due to various drawbacks, and most colleges and universities teach this theory. The second is the new theory from Germany and Japan. Judicial examination adopts this new theory. The biggest feature of this book is that the theoretical system adopts the theory of Germany and Japan, which is strictly consistent with the theoretical position of the judicial examination. One of the purposes of this book is to talk less about theory, more about conclusions, less about lectures and opinions, and more about answering standards. Many viewpoints and case materials in this book come directly from the works, papers and classroom lectures of the proposition teacher.
Fourth, how to "highlight key points and strengthen practice" in 2009-break through the critical point.
The average score of students in the first society in the fourth volume 12 fully shows that students lack practical processing ability.
Strengthen the training of judicial examples. Give a few more examples.
Verb (verb's abbreviation) Understanding of the level of mastery of the outline requirements: the life of law lies in practice!
Understand-→ Rationalize-→ Be familiar with and be able to use.
(What) (Why) (What)
5% 25% 80%
Sixth, decrypt the marking rules-let you get 20 points more and pass the exam smoothly!