As for Japan during the Warring States Period, first of all, the population of Japan was about 20 million at that time, while the population in the War-torn Three Kingdoms Period was 6.5438+0.2 million (the population loss was serious, and it was recorded later that the population of Shu was about 6.5438+0.2 million, that of Wu was about 2.5 million, and that of Wei was about 4 million, and it was estimated that it was about 6.5438+0.2 million).
Secondly, the level of education, children in the three countries in the world have the opportunity to study, mostly concentrated in the Central Plains. The education in remote Shu is not good, so there is a saying that there is no one in the later period of Shu. In contrast, Japan's Warring States period was 1000 years later than the Three Kingdoms, and its overall cultural level was higher than that of the ancient Three Kingdoms. However, at that time, the education level in Japan was not high, and education was basically called learning monks. Only the superior warriors had the opportunity to learn, and there were few rural warriors and civilians. Relatively speaking, the chances of growing into an able person are much lower. At that time, the level of cultural development in Japan was not high. Outside the central part of the state, there are rural areas, and most of the official schools in those places did not exist until the middle and late edo period. The Three Kingdoms and the Warring States are roughly equal, but the samurai learn both civil and military and Chinese, which is better than the Three Kingdoms.
And there is no official history book in Japan. The so-called history now is the military records of famous scholars, literati notes, anecdotes and even edo novels. Its credibility is too low and there are too many contradictions. But it is precisely because of this that the detailed level of its records greatly exceeds that of the Three Kingdoms, the number of characters recorded is more than ten times that of the Three Kingdoms, and the so-called famous soldiers are much more than the Three Kingdoms.
Finally, the standards of capable people are different. If Japan during the Warring States Period is divided into 66 countries, one country is divided into counties, one county has N townships, and one village is famous for its high military prestige. It's terrible to think about it. I'm afraid that Zhang Lu, who was in Hanzhong for twenty years during the Warring States Period, was an all-around 80+ star, while riding Jingzhou alone, according to Liu Biao, one-sixth of the world, was comparable to Beigang ... In addition, Jinchuan, as a famous scum, is really true. Is such a person capable? Gutian is such a master of tea ceremony. Is Honebo such a master of Go?
Besides, games are not facts. It is unacceptable to equate the ability of historical figures with numbers. Take the Wang Ye Walk game as an example. There are 1600 characters in it, and the Three Kingdoms has 12 characters. The landlord can think that there are many talented people in the Warring States Period. Of course it is wrong. The game should consider the gameplay and balance. To put it simply, in the history of the Three Kingdoms, there were few cities, many new wild cities and many military commanders.
Having said that, does the landlord have an answer? I'm exhausted. By the way, I despise Toyotomi Hideyoshi's party copying who invaded the DPRK and was abused by Daming downstairs. Daming defeated Japan, but its national strength was greatly damaged. Liaodong was full of dogs, and the domestic peasant uprising reached its peak. It can only be a lose-lose situation!
I hope the landlord will adopt the above.