What is the argumentation method used by takenism, and what are the advantages of this argumentation method?

The reason argument is used to prove the universality and regularity of the argument. Because argumentation is generally abstracted from concrete materials, its essence is induction, and induction is difficult to be complete in many cases. Therefore, if measured by theory, its reliability can be guaranteed.

The logical form of theoretical argumentation is deductive reasoning, that is, the inductive arguments are measured by scientific principles known to mankind. In addition to citing universal principles and principles, theories of various disciplines can also be used as arguments.

For example, physical theory and literary theory. The arguments of theoretical argumentation can also be proverbs, aphorisms and idioms that have stood the test of time and spread widely. This also includes the so-called "citation argument" in some articles.

Extended data:

Using the method of reasoning, this paper proves the viewpoint with the incisive opinions in classic works, famous sayings from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities and recognized scientific principles, theorems and formulas.

For example, the tenth paragraph of Talking about Reading (Book 9 of People's Education Edition) lists the functions of six kinds of scientific knowledge: "Reading history makes people wise, reading poetry makes people wise, calculus makes people precise, philosophy makes people think deeply, ethics makes people think, and logical rhetoric makes people articulate", and it is concluded that "knowledge can shape people's character".

The list is rich and detailed, and the conclusion is convincing. Because the materials cited in the argument are all scientific conclusions confirmed by objective reality, or people's recognized truth, theoretical authority and profound thoughts, they are irrefutable and persuasive.