What do you think of the three major books of judicial examination? I feel that in some places, it is a waste of time to review the knowledge that is afraid of details and how to solve it.

All three books are dictionaries, but I suggest you read them twice every two months (one and a half months if you are quick). You will be very confused at the first time and can't remember anything (but watch it no matter how annoying). The second time was much better. Do some real questions (not many, because it will be done many times later), so that you will have a comprehensive understanding of the college entrance examination. After that, you will feel much more relaxed when you watch any special lectures or listen to courseware.

Judicial examination is an art of giving up, and most details account for low marks. Two volumes and three volumes are mostly "constant weight". If you review carefully, the level is almost the same, mainly when you grasp civil punishment. Don't forget to look at the small law in 1 volume and the four cases in order to govern the country according to law. Some people say that 1 Volume 4 is the last surprise, but the characteristic of judicial examination is that the less you review, the less you may want to take it in the end. In this case, you have to carry a lot of things, and most people are here.

The above is just my personal suggestion, for reference only. Of course, you know your own situation best. Finally, I wish you good luck in the exam this year.