The following is a passage I picked up. Please sit down for reference.
There are 9 names in each of the two lists. The names on the first list are: Fu Yixian, Wang Shidan, Bi Yuan, Lin Rentang, Gan Yunjin, Liu Zizhuang, Chen Yuan, Liu Fuyao and Liu Chunlin. The names on the second list are: Li Yu, Hong Sheng, Gu Yanwu, Jin Shengtan, Huang Zongxi, Wu Jingzi, Pu Songling, Hong Xiuquan and Yuan Shikai. It is said that someone once showed these two lists to 1 people and asked them if they were familiar with them. Results Among the 1 people, seven people didn't know anyone on the first list. Most people on the second list know (that's what I do).
what are the intriguing aspects of these two lists? The nine people on the first list were all top candidates in the imperial examinations in the Qing Dynasty. At that time, they were chosen by the imperial examinations, and they were selected by stereotyped writing. They were once brilliant and prominent in the era of yue longmen. The nine people on the second list are all the last scholars in the Qing Dynasty. It is conceivable that they are unhappy with no way to enter the official position and no way to be promoted, and that they are bored and desperate.