It was more than ten years ago that I watched Triple Door, and I still remember that it mentioned "Pentopidan". As a lover of foreign literature, I know a little about Pontoppidan. He is a Danish writer who won the Nobel Prize in Literature and is the representative of "Lucky Bill". At that time, although Han Han jokingly mentioned the author's name, it was enough to surprise me. Now, it makes sense. This paper begins with Lucky Bill by Pontoppidan.
Han Han and I are about the same age. Lucky Bill was translated into Chinese in the 1990s. I have this book, but I haven't read it. I glanced at the preface and got a general idea of its content. Bill is an idealistic young man, determined to make progress, but was blocked by conservative forces and various people, and finally returned to the countryside because of physical and mental exhaustion. I dare to guess that Han Han can only remember the name of a foreign writer who is unfamiliar to most people after reading this book. I don't know Han Han, nor do I know Han Han. I can only continue to guess that he was influenced by the book Lucky Bill.
Reminiscent of Han Han's experience in those days, it is like meat on the chopping block, which is poked by critics with cold knives and hot knives. There is a lot of controversy, and a hundred schools of thought contend. Under the temper, Han Han also became a knife, not only with sharp thinking, but also with sharp words. I think a lot of reading in my youth is the foundation, and crossing the mountains has promoted his growth and improvement. Quoting Auden's comment on Ye Zhi, he "turned the curse into a vineyard".
Today's Han Han has been able to handle the sword rain with ease. As always, people judge him according to their own impressions, and even praise him from the heart out of a temporary mood. If not, he is abusive. Fortunately, Han Han also began to criticize right and wrong with a knife, which is really ironic to this society. Shi Sheng is just a paper lantern. It looks beautiful. If you poke it, it will be a hole. Of course, if you poke it, it will be out of harmony.
Han Han no longer writes novels and doesn't even care about the title of writer. There is a tendency to be indifferent to the world in his prose. If he hasn't loved, how can he resent it? If the world doesn't love me, why not die? Once upon a time, how many people really cared about the meat on the chopping block? At that age, we have to bear the cynicism of the world. Who is qualified to blame Han Han's death? The night gave me black eyes, but I used them to look for light.
Han Han doesn't write novels and essays, just like Bai Yang. Reality is far more bleak than novels, and essays are always more straightforward than novels. Look again, Yu Hua, Yu Yu, Mo Yan, Chen and Wang Anyi, writers who have been trained in this land, can't really dig a lot of holes in Das Kapital. To tell the truth, we need writers like Dickens more. To tell the truth, there is no hope in this life.
In a word, Han Han is smart. Quoting Rilke's poem "There is no victory at all, persistence means everything". For Han Han, it can be changed to "What luck? It is better to go your own way than anything else. "
2
Han Han wrote satire. Other than that, there is nothing. This is related to its pride in not reading books. In fact, like Jing M.Guo, Wang Shuo of Zheng is just an entertainment star hyped by commercial times. Like those film and television pop singers, who but ignorant farmers will like them? Cheating you out of money is not negotiable. They should go abroad. Pick up girls, you have to be fooled yourself. Who is to blame? What you like has nothing to do with others, but if you get it in public, it will disgust others. What are the good literary works since mankind entered fast food commercial times? Young people nowadays have suffered? Just by imagination? Still crossing? Even if you have a certain talent, it has already been polished. Anyway, compared with the beauty, affection, thought, art and plot of the ancients, it is a hundred thousand miles away. (Of course, the ancient people's high literary achievements also had objective conditions at that time. )
So, what's the use of saying that you are hype all day? It's interesting that you become a different person.
Has it been revealed that Han Han is the guy who took money from the CIA?
Of course, it is also possible to take money from the State Council or NSA.
It's just one thing anyway.
Orwell, Russell and others all took dollars.
Now Han Han can finally be on an equal footing with the masters in some aspects.
As for Wang Yi, Ding Lin's generation,
I must have been friends with various foundations for many years.
three
Play with Han Han
The following paragraph is the preface written by Han Han for his book Grass:
Friends who buy this book can put it with poison. In the modern history of China, we found that what is often defined as poisonous weeds is the most beautiful thing. Poisonous weeds inspire us to make progress and become poisonous weeds, which is often a writer's greatest honor.
This preface consists of three sentences. In the second sentence, I agree with him very much. Needless to say, I think everyone knows something about Lu Xun. Just look at his experience. In addition, I think our current problems in the literary world are too harmonious.
The more poisonous weeds, the better.
However, it is a high honor to be a poisonous weed in China. This title can only be given to you by readers, not self-styled. Please look up at Han Xu's first sentence here.
Han Han, I applaud you for wanting to be a poisonous weed, but you can't ask your readers to put your book called Poison and that book called Grass together.
Last sentence, I appreciate Han Han very much.
Note: This is an experiment. What will be said later?
four
In fact, when the Lu Xun Literature Prize was established, it was not intended to oppose the contradictory literature prize, nor could it be opposed-it was all official. Is it that Mao Dun's works, which lost the literature prize, won the Lu Xun literature prize? Under the domestic political trick of "must return its innocence", it is bound to be an equally divided result. So this is just politics first. If someone is confused and really regards it as a pure literary prize, then I really don't know what party it is.
What is left is the resentment of Han Han, who flaunted the "independent spirit", after being rejected by the official appraisal; Publishers' bosses flout the rules through speculation; And a serious audience; Finally, the implication is that fen Qing, who plays Taiping boxing.
five
Two people's different growing environments have created different personalities.
Han Han's parents are of high quality and give their children emotional and rational love. Therefore, although Han Han is rebellious, what he is rebellious is only those remarks and behaviors that people can't look past and violate moral conscience. After all, he is a gentle and kind person. Temperament Wen Ya
Like Han Han, Fan Meizhong has great talent, but his living environment is miserable. His parents may be poor farmers with low education and many children, so he can't give his children such ideal affection. He can only get ahead by his own talent. He won the first prize in the province and entered the highest university in the country. However, when he found the gap between himself and others in knowledge and quality, the gap was so big that he was seriously stimulated. So he reflected on his education and decided to change something, but in his wish, there was a madman's temperament, which was both arrogant and inferior. Personality split caused by suffering. Selfishness and meanness are tragedies that individuals cannot change because of their growing environment.
Fan grew up in a backward country, with many children and everything on his own, so his selfish character is caused by the environment besides his nature. It is because self-protection is always the first. There is arrogance and truth in his dictionary, but there is no compassion.
This is also his destiny.
His performance in the earthquake was a great turning point in his life, from a person who claimed to pursue the truth to a degree that people shouted. In fact, the reason is only that he spoke his mind, just to comfort those friends who were teased because of his self-care in the earthquake, so his spirit was stimulated a little. In the words of President Guangya, he comforted others, but in a self-destructive way: I am who I am, and there is nothing special that I can't forgive myself.
On the one hand, it is arrogant, on the other hand, it lacks the real self-confidence given by Han Han's good family education. He was uneasy and had to tell himself again and again that there was nothing serious wrong with what he had done, but in the process of verification, he forgot that nature was not equal to greatness, and that the understanding and tolerance of others did not mean that what he had done was enlightening.
He has no serious sin, and public opinion has judged him too seriously. But he doesn't have the superhuman temperament that he firmly believes in, but he is a bitter old boys with a hard environment and good talent, who gets theoretical and ideological support through his own efforts.
five
Not long ago, after Han Han's invitation to host a magazine was published online, many people who love writing opened their eyes and discussed it. First, they were happy. Second, they were surprised. Third, they sighed. Fourth, they cheered.
Writers are happy with this high-cost information and surprised that the world is really going to change, so that God finally sees this depressed literary market and this literary career that makes writers unable to get living expenses.
Lamenting such a high manuscript fee, the magazine will not have too high requirements, or others will pretend. However, now that the magazine will be officially launched in August, these people finally have a stone in their hearts.
The cost of 1000-2000 is astronomical in China. No matter where we are, what we see is below 100 yuan. In this case, Han Han is a bold new figure in China for more than 5,000 years. A man who broke history. And this series of triggers, will he be a figure who promotes and prospers literature in China, a country with a population of more than one billion? Can he set off a big storm of prosperity in China in the 2/kloc-0 century, a storm of leading figures managing wealth?
Come on! Cheer for Han Han to save China literati and literary world.
Han Han has stood firm since his book was published. On the racing line, he is a handsome guy dancing with his hair fluttering in the wind. He is an idol of girls, an idol writer and an idol racing driver of all young people. Today, he wants to break through this historic new field of literature and create a new literary space and a brand-new literary system for China in the future. Can he really be this person? This is also a problem worthy of our discussion and study. Then tell me. Is Han Han such a character? The savior of literary depression? Can he really succeed? Will it disappoint us?
Liang Wendao, a Hong Kong cultural person, said that Han Han was the next Lu Xun. Can he really become Lu Xun? No, Lu Xun is Lu Xun. Lu Xun in a black-and-white society can never compare with Han Han now. Of course, Han Han cannot be compared with Lu Xun. First, their living environment is different. Where is the next Lu Xun? Han Han is full of the flavor of the times. A leader who is about to save China's literary industry after thousands of years of depression. Lu Xun did not bring substantial literature construction, so Lu Xun and Han Han are naturally different.
Now he has sent some "xianggong" information about the magazines he sponsored, and the first issue has a first print of 300,000 copies. This is what makes him different. A person who saves the future development is this kind of energy. Astronomical manuscript fees, the sixth issue is also expected to be profitable. Therefore, the problem before us is that Han Han will soon save China literature, which has gone downhill for thousands of years, and become the driving force for prosperity.
six
Han Han should learn some philosophy.
I don't like to express my opinion as a teacher, but I think it is necessary to make an exception for Han Han's recent remarks against Jackie Chan.
Han Han should learn some philosophy before writing an article.
Why do I think he is lacking in this respect?
Han Han said: We usually have two understandings of the relationship between the government and the people. One is Jackie Chan's "management" and the other is a small group of people's "service". The government naturally prefers to be a boss rather than a waiter, because waiters can only charge according to industry practices, while bosses can set their own charging standards, waiters can only operate within the scope prescribed by law, and bosses can make laws. What is the difference between the need of identity management and the need of identity service? The difference is whether you can be Jackie Chan or a lawbreaker. (Excerpted from the original text of his blog "Learn to read the sacred meaning like Jackie Chan" and the wrong punctuation)
If he had a little philosophical knowledge, he wouldn't simply put "management" and "service" against each other under the banner of "we".
Here we need to quote the simplest concept "unity of opposites", and it is estimated that everyone knows the connotation of this concept.
As far as a country is concerned, the management and service functions of the government are such a concept. Management is actually a kind of service, and service is also a way of management. If Han Han can't figure it out, think about your family. Does dad care or love you because he won't let you race with the bus on the road in a stroller? If mom forgot to breast-feed you, did she not serve you well, or did she not manage your life well?
Maybe Han Han will say that the government is not my parents. I just want the government to serve me well, and I don't want the government to control me.
If I knew something about philosophy, I would not be so naive. There is a simple reason. If you want to serve well, you must manage it well. If we want to manage it well, we must strengthen our services. The most obvious thing is that in order to make Han Han "succeed", the government should first lock up criminals as much as possible, otherwise they may be kidnapped and robbed before Han Han graduated from primary school. The law doesn't allow criminals to do this, but criminals don't go to jail after reading the law books. It was the government that started the state machine and arrested the criminals by coercive means.
This is the philosophical relationship between service and management.
If you don't understand philosophy, even the simplest concepts, it is foolish to talk rashly without being surprised, and it will have a very bad influence on your audience or readers, especially your classmates who like you. To put it more seriously, it is to harm people with fallacies and heresies. It is clearly the unity of opposites, but Han Han is vaguely defined as opposites. Therefore, it is very irresponsible and ignorant to incite confrontation between the people and the government.
In Han Han's blog, there are many reprimands and criticisms of the government. Many friends, especially young friends, think that what he said is "the people are the masters of the country", but I can say responsibly that this is a genuine pseudo-people and a real grandstanding. The true concept of "the people are the masters of the country" definitely does not regard the government as omnipotent, and any problems can be blamed on the past. The government is just a facility or tool that we all use to gain ideal sense of security and happiness and solve some problems that are not conducive to social progress and development, such as shovels when planting trees. Some students, such as Han Han, don't understand philosophy, so they blame the shovel for not working well. Students who understand philosophy, such as me, will think about whether they have problems, such as strength.
It is not difficult to know a little philosophy. Han Han is not busy with his studies. Obviously, he just wanted to prove his "justice" by scolding the shovel. I want to tell him, first of all, to learn philosophy, and secondly, not to take outdated provocative methods as the foundation of the body, not to mention that it is really not the true spirit of the people. In this regard, we should understand some plain but progressive ideas. I like Professor Xiong Bingyuan's words very much. He just wants people to get more information and know their own interests. As for the government, he said, "We finally broke away from the authoritative political structure and called on the authorities to let go, but the people were afraid. How can we ask the authorities to show charm and be bold? " Don't you just want the absolute authority of the past to come back from the dead? Isn't that a backward step in the people's political development? "Professor Xiong Bingyuan is an economist in Taiwan Province Province. His ideas may be different from those of Chinese mainland, but I absolutely agree with his views on how scholars and even people treat the government. I think this passage is enough to awaken Han Han.
"A historian once said: The quality of a society depends on whether it can produce great leaders! The worker philosopher Hofer has a different understanding. He said: the quality of a society depends on whether it can function normally without a great leader! Perhaps, when we can live a leisurely life and don't expect the authorities to respond boldly, our society can be regarded as a modern people-oriented society that has been on the track ... "
After talking for so long, I only hope that students who are used to reading Han Han's articles can think calmly. Are we proud of opposing the government by accusing it like Han Han, or are we down-to-earth and using our own skills to help the government and its progress, truly benefit the society and serve the people? Are we going to argue in ignorance whether the government should manage us or serve us, or do something really meaningful for the rejuvenation of the country and the nation with long-term vision and ambition?
I think everyone will make the right choice.
seven
The gentle Liu Zhenyun is still the old man Han.
The post "Liu Zhenyun: Han Han is still tender" in "Cat's Eye Watching People" is a bit vague. After reading it, I don't know whether Liu Zhenyun said Han Hannen or the post owner himself said it.
However, as for Liu and Han, who is young and who is old, we might as well argue.
As far as the age is concerned, it is obvious that Teacher Liu and Han Nen have nothing to argue about. Obviously, when we say young and old, we mean articles. After reading most people's posts, it seems that most people's conclusions, in terms of works and writing, are still Liu Lao and Han Nen. However, it is at this point that I am contrary to the opinion of most people. I can affirm without hesitation that Han is better than Liu in the complexity of his works and writing.
Literature cannot be summarized by age. I have explained this point in my previous article, so I won't repeat it here.
Always confuse literature with age, which is a manifestation of lack of autonomy, conformity and thinking shackles.
In addition, a "0 1 east" student has a certain level of follow-up, saying, "Where is the real hero of China?" Look at the movements of China in the past dynasties, such as the Hu Feng Rebellion Group, the anti-rightist movement, the Cultural Revolution and so on. China's Jie Jun and potential Jie Jun were wiped out-sadly, China's ideological and cultural masters could only be born in "troubled times" and in the era of great collapse.
Writers such as Wang Shuo, Jin Yong and Han Han all have their own talents, but when these "half-baked writers" are worshipped by the whole people, the authors are deeply resentful that those truly talented writers have been strangled, and at the same time feel sad for this era of "slavery". "
However, the following "Dongli 0 1" added: "One thing that impressed the post-80s generation is the myth that the Internet has created a group of youth wealth. The post-80s generation enjoyed this "prosperous time" to show off their wealth, not anything else. Ideas? Art? Literature? -Ha ha ha, this is their weakness. It is the dirt behind their ears that is not cleaned under the packaging of their foreign clothes. This is something that can't be on the table at all. If you just show off, it will only make people sick and make people laugh. " There is something wrong with this. The so-called thought, art and literature. As far as all our contemporary achievements are concerned, this is the case. Not only after 80, but also after 70, 60 and 50. If this is used to suppress Han Yang and Liu, or to praise Han and belittle Liu, it is still a mistake of thinking mode.
Conclusion: As far as literature is concerned, Liu Zhenyun and Han Han are still a false proposition. The persistence of this can only show the shallowness of the holder.