On the Metrics and Equivalence of Poetry

Ancient poetry (aside, later) is divided into ancient poetry and modern poetry, at that time.

At some time, it was probably bounded by the Tang Dynasty, that is, the poetic style formed after the Tang Dynasty (including the prosperous Tang Dynasty) was called

Modern poetry. Among them, ancient poetry only requires rhyme, and does not pay attention to any meter. Modern poetry is right.

Rhyme and balance have very strict requirements, that is, meter. I don't want to explain anything today

It's one meter, which is too long. If you are interested, you can visit my homepage. I just want to talk.

Talk about our attitude towards rice today.

Personally, I think the formation of meter is purely for the beauty and elegance of meter.

Most French poems are melodious, ups and downs, full of soul. This is for the better.

It is very helpful to express the theme of poetry, and it is also a lot of beautiful poems in ancient times.

An important reason for its spread.

-flying down three thousands of feet, it is suspected that the Milky Way has fallen for nine days.

-On a frosty night, Jiang Feng fished to sleep.

-But all you have to do is go up one flight of stairs, and you can broaden your horizons by 300 miles.

-Qian Fan is beside the sinking ship, and Wan Muchun is in front of the sick tree.

Reading these poems, they are so catchy that meter plays an important role. So learn.

It is good for us to try to write poems according to the rules.

However, meter is not the "Shangfang Sword" that binds us to write poetry. That idea

Writing poetry must be qualified, and the idea that unqualified methods are dross is unacceptable.

First, qualified poems can have beautiful melodies, not unqualified ones.

Poetry must have no beautiful melody. For example:

There are no birds in the mountains, and thousands of people are missing.

A boat on the river, a fisherman wearing his webworm moth; Fishing alone is not afraid of snow and ice.

There are many irregularities in this poem, but it is pleasant to read.

Second, if there is a conflict between the meter and the content, it is necessary to focus on the content.

We should not only keep the exact meaning of poetry, but also not give up the meter. If you refuse for the sake of rhythm

Abandoning the content is simply putting the cart before the horse, and the whole poem will be completely abolished. In A Dream of Red Mansions

Daiyu has such a saying, "If there is a strange sentence, it will occasionally be uneven, but also to make

I see. "The ancients still so, the situation than today? But the point here is that if you write poetry,

As long as unqualified laws are said to be in conflict with the content, it is absolutely impossible. In fact, sometimes

We can adapt to the meter without destroying the content. That's not much to ask.

Is an incorrect writing attitude. Give an example of giving up rice for content.

Son:

The fairy of the past has flown away by the yellow crane, leaving only an empty Yellow Crane Tower.

The yellow crane never revisited earth, there have been no long white clouds for thousands of years.

"Yellow crane" appears in the same position in the first sentence and the second sentence, which is a big taboo in regular poetry.

However, everyone can see that the word "yellow crane" has been broken and cannot be changed. The third and fourth sentences are also

There is an unqualified work in six different tones. But why is this poem still popular for a long time?

Is it far-reaching? Therefore, I advise everyone to "use it for me, and I will not suffer from it."

Third, since metrical poems are difficult to write (I can't write well anyway), ancient times

There are already ancient poems in the poem, which can only rhyme. For beginners,

Writing ancient poems is not dull or sticky, and there may be nothing wrong with it.

Finally, I want to say that some literary friends have recently written ancient poems that don't rhyme, and I'm afraid.

Not so good. Rhyme itself is the biggest feature of ancient poetry. No rhyme, I'm afraid it can't be called ancient.

Poetry. Maybe someone will say why some ancient poems don't rhyme. That's because ... ...

The reason why the ancient sound is different from the present sound is that the ancient people read these poems in rhyme. take for example

The word "oblique" is pronounced "summer".

For Chinese characters, we should also pay attention to the level tone, and the character spectrum stipulates what level tone is.

What, different aphorisms don't have completely unified metrical requirements, their flat format and pressure?

The position of rhyme has its own rules (of course, the rhythm of words is still related to the rhythm of metrical poems)

Words are different from poems, and there are many kinds of epigrams, which can be remembered in thousands. Poetry is relatively necessary.

Much more monotonous. So if we can try to combine the flat format of the text with some special points.

Let the words of this epigraph have the same style and different flavors. also

In other words, the rhyme of words is not only beautiful in sound, but also has the function of presenting the characteristics of epigrams.

Because I haven't been involved in poetry for a long time, it is inevitable that the content of complaints is somewhat stretched, and I still hope to be knowledgeable.

People are generous in criticizing and correcting me, and Tianya is grateful.