It is better to spend time studying literature and other things, and have to recite so many things.
I mean, how about studying as a student? As for studying for so long?
I am bored to death. Teacher China is very scary. I wish I could read. Why is learning so complicated?
In the taxi, the female driver listened to me and said that the destination was school. She guessed that I was a teacher and asked me a question: "What is the purpose of learning mathematics?" I was inexplicably asked what difficulties she had encountered. She said that when the child went to kindergarten, the teacher asked her to pay for the "math class", saying that if she didn't lay a good foundation and couldn't keep up with the primary school, the teacher would discriminate; So her children began to do math problems at the age of 4. Later, I went to elementary school, listened to the teacher and went to the "Olympic math class"; In junior high school, children have to do many math problems every day, and often come back to ask for money and buy problem sets to do at home. "But now that I'm a sophomore, my daughter told me that she doesn't like math at all," sighed the female driver. "I just want to know, what's the use of learning this math?"
Only 15 minutes to the destination. I can't explain the role of learning mathematics in such a short time, but even if I have more time, I can't explain it clearly, because I still don't understand the educational role of "children's olympiad". I can only say, "If you don't like something, it's meaningless, but you're a sophomore. Let's wait until you pass the college entrance examination."
"Get away with the college entrance examination"? I wish I could get by.
After reading it, I thought with trepidation: What is the purpose of learning Chinese?
Nowadays, Chinese teachers are very much like the onlookers in The Emperor's New Clothes. Everyone enthusiastically supports the new curriculum reform, in fact, they are whispering: why are the new clothes worn in Chinese teaching missing? Everyone seems to be naked, wriggling around in the crowd, performing the show of research study, compulsory course, elective course ... playing around, everyone is still naked, performing karate!
Think of a question related to the topic: Teacher, how can we learn Chinese well?
Like me, a Chinese teacher probably pretends to ponder: Chinese ... circling ... accumulating ... reading ... practicing pen diligently ... makes students confused, and then we lock ourselves in the cage of Chinese teaching with relief! The key point is that we haven't figured out what it means to learn Chinese well.
Our standards have never been so vague!
As far as the ancestors are concerned, the standard of learning Chinese well (there was probably no concept of "Chinese" at that time) was whether they could read classics well. Can you write a book? To put it simply, a poem can be written in seven steps like Cao Zhi, a hundred poems about fighting wine can be like Li Bai, and a quip like a pearl can be like Qian Zhongshu.
Let's talk about it recently. Just like when I was in middle school, there were exams. The standard of learning Chinese well is whether the handwriting is good, whether the article has been published or not, and of course, whether the exam results are excellent or not.
What about now? Those who have published articles may fail in the Chinese exam, and those who have lied all over the place may do well in the exam. The so-called inquiry questions in the exam instructions eventually evolved into "everyone is happy" because "everyone has a chance", no matter whether you learn Chinese well or not; The reading topic of ancient poetry, which was originally intended to carry forward the national cultural tradition, finally evolved into the enduring "blending of scenes", "combining reality with reality" and "expressing ambition with things"; Topical comments similar to the civil service examination Shen Lun eventually evolved into eternal "different opinions", "disagreement", "controversy" and "questioning".
When we get the news that the average score has risen sharply, should we celebrate the general improvement of our Chinese test level, or should we be depressed that our Chinese literacy level has dropped sharply?
I said, which student is good at Chinese? Is it excellent or something else? Sometimes, I really don't know which student is good at Chinese.
When people have high hopes and understand that the fairest college entrance examination cannot really measure a student's Chinese level, what do you mean by learning Chinese well?
When the saying that there is only one composition in the college entrance examination is rampant, I am surprised: just like I usually live in a utopia.
-
"China people" around us.
Students learn Chinese in class and also from sociology. So, what kind of "language" and "literature" can today's society provide for students?
I used to persuade students to read newspapers, but later I stopped reading them myself, let alone persuade students to read newspapers. I think some content is not good for students' writing study. We emphasize that the words are sincere, but look at those words in the newspaper. Is it "sincerity"? Even if there is, it will take its time. I used to buy some newspapers of the day in class, so that students can comment on the headlines and learn how to write news. I dare not now. Students will not only be exposed to nonstandard language, bizarre typos, strange ill sentences and inexplicable headlines in newspapers, but also face embarrassing pictures and various indecent advertisements for boys and girls. Of course, I don't want students to be interested in "rule of law reports" and all kinds of scandals of selling dog meat like teaching thieves.
I don't want to be interviewed by reporters because they make mistakes almost every time. It's not my fault, but journalists often make some misinterpretations, sometimes perhaps out of maintaining the seriousness of the discourse system, sometimes to make up for their own shortcomings, and sometimes because they lack the minimum awareness of respecting people, insisting on making things out of nothing and adding fuel to the vinegar. So if possible, I want to write it myself. Although I know that the editor will make some cuts, as long as he doesn't "embellish", I can still accept it, because even if the bits and pieces left after the cuts are deformed, that's what I said.
I don't encourage students to watch TV news, because those words are not typical national language, and the expression of the host is often not solemn and not worth learning. Rare and valuable TV programs are arranged late at night, and prime time is reserved for businesses that can "generate benefits".
Students listen to university professors, and some professors probably underestimate the Chinese ability of middle school students. They often make irresponsible remarks, some of them are inarticulate, stuttering and full of mistakes. However, when the president finally gives a speech, he will definitely say "Thank you for giving us a wonderful report." So every time I see students booing under the stage, it's not just for the cultivation of students.
When a reporter interviews a farmer or a citizen's grandmother, he should be able to see "opening his mouth to see his throat". But somehow, these "grass-roots people" are also bureaucratic, often desperate and only preach the truth. They like to say "thanks to the leaders" and "thanks to the government".
Pupils are only three feet tall, full of milk, and speak in the same way. In an interview with CCTV, I generally don't care what the interviewee says; But once they interview primary school students, I pay special attention to the fact that my worst fears happen again and again. Who educated those children? Why can't you speak normally like an individual at a young age?
When several graduates of normal university apply, according to the current procedure, it is also routine to submit a job application, express their wishes in the preface and introduce themselves. But I think the requirements for students who graduate from the Chinese department should be a little higher, because you are here to be a Chinese teacher. However, that cover letter rarely touched me. I sometimes don't understand why these normal students even talk like words pouring out of that "model" Later, I learned that they were all downloaded online.
Recently, I saw the editors' learning experience of "Baodi" in a publishing house. These editors have high academic qualifications, some have compiled high-quality books, and some have won national awards. However, what kind of "heart" does their "experience" come from? Those words, like machines, are lifeless. They make their thoughts so dry or hypocritical that they are not ashamed. Words, I cry for you.
When I said these words, all the teachers who came to the class laughed. Wait a minute, now let's see what we have done, shall we?
Every teacher, no matter how far away, has written many summaries and reports since he went to college. If he applies for a professional title, he must write a "work report". Many comrades have also written various applications and experiences, and so on. Let me ask you a question: What do comrades usually write in the first paragraph of these practical articles?
-Speaking of which, many teachers laughed. Yes, we should remember what we wrote. Does that sound like a Chinese teacher? Like a person with language ability? Did you say that after thinking in your own head? Also, are those words "Chinese" that students can learn?