Please explain what is wrong with Su Dongpo's continuation poems from the angle of inductive reasoning.

One day, Su Dongpo went to visit Prime Minister Wang Anshi, who happened to be not at home. Su Dongpo saw a draft of a poem chanting chrysanthemums on Wang Anshi's desk, and then wrote the first two sentences: last night, the west wind crossed the garden and yellow flowers were blowing all over the ground.

Su Dongpo believes that "west wind" is autumn wind and "yellow flower" is chrysanthemum. Chrysanthemum is the most cold-resistant and durable. How can you be blown down by the autumn wind if you dare to fight with the autumn frost? It would be a big mistake to say that the west wind "blows yellow flowers everywhere". Whether Wang Anshi is his predecessor or not, this arrogant academician picked up a pen and continued his poem: Autumn flowers are not better than spring flowers, and he said that he should sing carefully with poets.

After Wang Anshi came back, he read these two poems and was very dissatisfied. In order to teach Su Dongpo a lesson with facts, he demoted Su Dongpo to Yingyong, Huangzhou. Su Dongpo lived in Huangzhou for nearly a year. In September, as soon as the gale stopped, Su Dongpo invited his friend Chen Jichang to enjoy chrysanthemums in the backyard. I saw chrysanthemums falling in succession and gold scattered all over the floor. At this time, he remembered the past that continued Wang Anshi's poems and realized that he was wrong.

From the perspective of inductive reasoning, there is a mistake of "hasty generalization" in Su Dongpo's continuation poems. "Reckless generalization" is a logical error that is easy to occur in inductive reasoning. "Reckless generalization", also known as "generalization from part to whole", refers to drawing a general conclusion based on only a few individual facts, and taking this conclusion as an inevitable and unquestionable conclusion.

Su Dongpo usually sees chrysanthemums that will only wither and not fall off, so he draws a general conclusion that "chrysanthemums in the world will not be blown off by autumn wind". He measured Wang Anshi's poems about chrysanthemums with this full-name affirmative judgment, and thought that Wang Anshi's poems were not written correctly. After living in Huangzhou for nearly a year, he realized that his conclusion was wrong. Because the chrysanthemums in Huangzhou will be blown off by the autumn wind. With this counterexample, the general conclusion drawn by Su Dongpo through simple enumeration cannot be established.

This is someone else's answer. Let me borrow it.