Advantages and disadvantages of double reduction policy

Advantages and disadvantages of double reduction policy;

Benefits:

1. "Double reduction" is beneficial to children's physical and mental health.

"Double reduction" really reduces the workload of children and realizes the burden reduction of children. Children who reduce their burdens will of course be happier. Children who are seven or eight years old and eleven or twelve years old are in the period of growth and development. In order to finish a lot of homework, they go to bed late every night. Under such strong pressure, they lost a lot of fun at this age. Even adults, faced with such great pressure every day, will inevitably collapse, which is definitely not conducive to the healthy development of children's body and mind.

2。 "Double reduction" lightened the burden on parents.

"Double reduction" can reduce parents' anxiety about their children's learning to a certain extent. I believe that every parent will have experienced such a thing. Usually the mother is kind and filial, and the chicken flies and the dog jumps. Parents who are usually gentle and obedient usually have only ten minutes of patience when tutoring their children's homework. In the end, most of them end up with parents yelling and children crying. Afterwards, some parents will regret it, apologize to their children, and promise not to lose their temper when doing homework in the future. I believe everyone will have an experience of this result, and they will still jump up and scream when they write their homework next time. At present, there are many news that parents are hospitalized for cerebral hemorrhage due to counseling homework, and the parent-child relationship is affected by counseling homework. "Double reduction" liberates parents' ideological burden, releases parents' economic pressure, and is conducive to the stability and harmony of parent-child relationship and family.

Disadvantages:

It is difficult to truly alleviate the anxiety of education, completely eradicate the training and counseling of off-campus subjects, and increase the pressure and burden of teachers' work.

Under the new supervision mechanism required by the double reduction policy, the length of students' homework is controlled and the quality is improved. Face-to-face teaching, answering questions and counseling all focus on meeting students' individualized learning needs, which means that the traditional cramming teaching in large classes is gradually changing to individualized teaching in small classes. At the same time, the after-school service advocated by this policy focuses on expanding the breadth of school education, promoting the diversified and personalized development of students, and thus improving the comprehensive quality of school quality education. In recent years, the off-campus training industry under the influx of excessive capital is very strange. There are also a few unlicensed operations and false propaganda. The double reduction policy promulgated this time has severely hit the "barbaric growth" of off-campus training in many ways.

The focus of the double reduction policy is nine-year compulsory education. Although senior three is mentioned in writing, the requirements are not detailed. Senior three is the hardest hit area for education anxiety and exam anxiety. Moreover, before the society truly realizes diversified material selection, the "score-only theory" can hardly be truly overthrown. Under the influence of the above two points, the evaluation criteria of each period have not changed fundamentally, and the expectations of society and parents for schools and teachers have naturally not changed. At the same time, the introduction of the double reduction policy has increased the weight of in-school education. In view of the gap between schools in teaching level and infrastructure, this move is bound to aggravate parents' tendency to choose schools. From this point of view, the double reduction policy is suspected of indirectly inciting educational anxiety, but it violates its original intention. As mentioned above, it may be difficult to really restrain the educational anxiety. As long as the "score-only theory" and the trend of choosing schools are not reduced, there will still be a market for off-campus subject training. The impact of the double reduction policy on off-campus discipline training may only be to reduce its supply under the condition of undiminished demand, but the result is only an increase in the supply cost of discipline training, and the related training will be transformed into tutoring and private education, and the darkness will continue to survive.

Legal basis:

Article 29 of the Education Law of the People's Republic of China Schools and other educational institutions shall exercise the following rights:

(1) Autonomous management in accordance with the articles of association;

(2) Organizing the implementation of educational and teaching activities;

(3) Recruiting students or other educatees;

(four) the management of student status, the implementation of incentives or sanctions;

(five) to issue corresponding academic certificates to the educated;

(six) the appointment of teachers and other employees, the implementation of incentives or sanctions;

(seven) the management and use of the facilities and funds of this unit;

(eight) to reject any organization or individual's illegal interference in education and teaching activities;

(nine) other rights stipulated by laws and regulations.

The state protects the lawful rights and interests of schools and other educational institutions from infringement.