Why do you always say that somewhere in a poem is the use of the previous poem?

The first floor uses allusions, but in the current literary theory, it is "allusions and images", instead of using previous poems.

The rest are irrelevant answers.

Let me tell you that this so-called "using someone's poem" is actually probabilistic reasoning (logical concept). In other words, unless the author himself indicates the source, it is all figured out by later generations and cannot be confirmed-you can't dig the poet out of the grave and confront him, can you? Ha ha.

However, if we study this idea, it is also valuable. I mean, study how writers judge that "a poem has been used by predecessors".

The so-called "transformation" contains two meanings: one is "transformation" and the other is "utilization". In short, it is not only borrowing sentences from predecessors, but also through its own artistic transformation. As mentioned above, it is impossible to confirm whether it is chemical use or tacit understanding, only how likely it is. Then, when the poems of later generations are similar in artistic conception and writing style to those of previous generations, the higher the popularity and independent expression of previous generations' poems, the higher the possibility of future generations' poems being put into use. In particular, the sentences such as "Chengjiang is as quiet as practice" and "In late spring and March, the grass grows in the south of the Yangtze River, the peanut trees are mixed and the warblers fly around" have already belonged to the level of cultural labels, which are simply the lingering beauty in the minds of later poets and have become part of their "writing subconscious". Even if they didn't deliberately imitate those sentences when creating, they are really old bottles by definition.

More controversial is another situation. For example, the well-judged "Locked Balcony after Dreams" is a borrowing from Xu Hun's "Locked Balcony No One Came", and people have different opinions. Because Xu Hun's poems are not very good, and that sentence in Yan Ci is even more insignificant. Moreover, there are great differences between the two poems. It is likely that Yan wrote these scenes purely to pave the way for the following article.

There is also a situation that is purely far-fetched, like the example given on the first floor. If it is also useful to "find a peach garden to avoid Qin", it is nonsense.

In a word, "the article is eternal, and the gains and losses are known."